Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Hahahahaha, what a bogus post. No one able to - scrutinize your work. Your post useless

Posted: Jul 23rd, 2024 - 10:55 am In Reply to: People are standing up to the criticism and - scrutiny

No proof you are even an MT, or even do legal work. Totally bogus comment by you. Nothing new.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

You should all check into getting a job as a court reporter - as (Views: 955, 2024-07-18, 8:42 am)
- I do court reporting and have for a great number of years. - Sad you work for such low quality company (Views: 779, 2024-07-18, 8:53 am)
  - Lucky you! There's no rejection, just a lot of BS with doing - legal (Views: 647, 2024-07-18, 9:16 am)
    - Do not need your warnings; they are bogus. I work - for a quality company with quality (Views: 708, 2024-07-18, 9:21 am)
      - Again, bad mouthing me isn't going to change - the fact (Views: 569, 2024-07-18, 9:24 am)
        Again, bad mouthing others because you work in a poor - environment does not change the facts (Views: 560, 2024-07-18, 9:31 am)
        Yeah, you're just a ball buster taking offense to something - because (Views: 613, 2024-07-18, 9:43 am)
        And you resort to name calling and abuse simply - because you, by your own admission, (Views: 594, 2024-07-18, 10:05 am)
        Your posts are nothing but a bunch of cutdowns - so (Views: 524, 2024-07-18, 10:15 am)
        Check yourself. Just because you have a bad job and - bad experience, it is not like that for (Views: 514, 2024-07-18, 5:44 pm)
        Superior knowledge doesn't have a thing to do with - typing (Views: 574, 2024-07-18, 10:02 am)
        So instead of complaing, why are you not working - for a high quality company. (Views: 541, 2024-07-18, 10:07 am)
        I don't have a list of quality companies - sm (Views: 624, 2024-07-18, 10:17 am)
        Your lack of a quality list is a reflection on you, no one else. - If you are so good, no reason (Views: 540, 2024-07-18, 5:37 pm)
        This conversation is just off the charts - sm (Views: 540, 2024-07-18, 8:09 pm)
        Well, that is not what this thread was. It was one person - making a statement as if all (Views: 546, 2024-07-18, 8:41 pm)
        This is too funny. I am a court reporter doing legal - transcription (Views: 599, 2024-07-18, 9:03 pm)
        What do you expect, you people attack a person - and then (Views: 547, 2024-07-19, 7:03 am)
        Notice you skipped over the one that started all the attacking - Same one writing the original post (Views: 531, 2024-07-19, 8:46 am)
        I told the person they were a ball buster because I - am a man (Views: 448, 2024-07-19, 9:06 am)
        You started the namecalling. No one gives a damn why. - Then you act as if you are above the fray (Views: 476, 2024-07-19, 9:13 am)
        The name calling started when "it sounds to me like - etc (Views: 484, 2024-07-19, 9:22 am)
        The company I work for is a quality company. - they (Views: 566, 2024-07-19, 7:16 am)
        so...what does this have to do with a list - Nothing (Views: 517, 2024-07-19, 8:45 am)
        Man, you people are brutal with the snotty comments - sm (Views: 436, 2024-07-19, 8:48 am)
        taking a page out of your play book - ... (Views: 443, 2024-07-19, 8:59 am)
        Too many of you act like big babies, looking for any reason - to be offended. Put your big girl panties on (Views: 533, 2024-07-19, 9:09 am)
        No one is asking you for a job, sweetheart - nm (Views: 454, 2024-07-19, 9:15 am)
        ^^Well sweetheart, that is not what the post said - Now you cannot read^^ (Views: 470, 2024-07-19, 9:20 am)
  - Bad mouthing me isn't going to change the CR profression - and the lack (Views: 470, 2024-07-18, 9:22 am)
    - Continually bad mouthing those with solid experience - and great capabilities does not (Views: 572, 2024-07-18, 9:36 am)
      - Yeah. It doesn't take a whole lot of education to turn on a - recording device. (Views: 429, 2024-07-18, 9:45 am)
        Proves your ignorance of the field - Not surpiring. (Views: 449, 2024-07-18, 10:05 am)
        There's no ignorance, just experience - nm (Views: 466, 2024-07-18, 10:20 am)
        Not really. A reporter's job is to take down - the record (Views: 541, 2024-07-18, 10:33 am)
        More blah, blah, blah from the would-be - wannabe court reporter (Views: 483, 2024-07-18, 5:45 pm)
      - Hey, you got a list of companies with these - professional (Views: 539, 2024-07-18, 9:49 am)
        With your snotty, name calling, and abusive attitude, do your own - research. (Views: 486, 2024-07-18, 10:10 am)
        You're the only one calling me names - and lashing (Views: 507, 2024-07-18, 10:22 am)
        Try reading what you wrote. You definitely started with - the name calling and abuse. This is EXACTLY what (Views: 486, 2024-07-18, 5:33 pm)
  - Oh, lord, transcription companies for legal have - nothing to do (Views: 589, 2024-07-18, 4:10 pm)
    - If that is all you are getting paid, then that is - your doing, not the CR. (Views: 511, 2024-07-18, 6:01 pm)
  - Isn't that the truth. There are low quality companies - out there (Views: 494, 2024-07-18, 10:38 pm)
    - I work for both. Occasionally, you get a poor audio - but that happens so seldom (Views: 457, 2024-07-19, 8:44 am)
- There are many states that don't require mandatory - certification (Views: 520, 2024-07-18, 11:00 am)
- I've had read backs that were just brutal - because (Views: 515, 2024-07-18, 11:18 am)
  - Or the attorneys who didn't realize it was just recorded .. - anon (Views: 1815, 2024-07-18, 1:40 pm)
    - Yeah. Some of them are calling themselves digital reporters - now, (Views: 458, 2024-07-18, 2:33 pm)
- Here are some good notes for you - sm (Views: 525, 2024-07-18, 12:28 pm)
  - These are annotations, not CR notes. - You (Views: 525, 2024-07-18, 5:51 pm)
    - No, these are the notes - it is (Views: 479, 2024-07-18, 7:49 pm)
      - These are annotations. You can name it whatever you like. - They are annotations (Views: 522, 2024-07-18, 8:50 pm)
        Annotations are explanations. The actual words that were - being said (Views: 503, 2024-07-18, 10:45 pm)
    - Here you go, honey, a few more for you. These are not annotations - sm (Views: 507, 2024-07-18, 8:16 pm)
    - ^^Well Honey, not interested in reading anymore of your - sad sack posts. I hear Walmart is hiring^^ (Views: 544, 2024-07-18, 8:43 pm)
- MaxScribe is the VR for court reporting, so the CR - can sit back (Views: 521, 2024-07-19, 7:06 am)
  - I have used MaxScribe extensively. It is a very good - program. Unlike what some on here claim, (Views: 564, 2024-07-19, 8:55 am)
    - I know what annotations are. The CR notes that - I receive (Views: 557, 2024-07-19, 9:13 am)
    - Don't get me wrong, the CR did annotate the time stamp, the speaker - and (Views: 609, 2024-07-19, 9:34 am)
  - This is not the only program - there are several (Views: 436, 2024-07-19, 9:04 am)
- Not sure why some of you working in MaxScribe and other VR programs - for legal (Views: 546, 2024-07-20, 12:02 pm)
  - As you, people can post whatever they like. Seems you are - not aware, but using one function (Views: 478, 2024-07-21, 2:42 pm)
    - My notes are on the right side. Clearly, you are right - there is no reason, sm (Views: 408, 2024-07-22, 8:46 am)
    - Since MaxScribe utilizes Phoenix OnDemand voice recognition - there would (Views: 491, 2024-07-22, 8:59 am)
      - So what is your point. Some CRs still provide notes - even with MaxScribe. So what (Views: 412, 2024-07-22, 12:52 pm)
        The point is having a whole document of VR words and having - a word or two (Views: 451, 2024-07-22, 1:47 pm)
        The point is - sm (Views: 492, 2024-07-22, 1:57 pm)
        the CR profession has several sides - anon (Views: 479, 2024-07-22, 4:31 pm)
        Some court reporters work for court reporting agencies - and not all (Views: 500, 2024-07-22, 7:36 pm)
        not all CR agencies - use legal transcription companies (Views: 495, 2024-07-23, 11:29 am)
        Yes, some do and some do not. There's a big argument - here about (Views: 470, 2024-07-23, 2:14 pm)
        I agree. - anon (Views: 368, 2024-07-23, 2:38 pm)
        This is a far better description than some of the other claptrap - posted on this site (Views: 427, 2024-07-23, 4:21 pm)
        CR's notes are the property of the court. No one - reports these (Views: 418, 2024-07-28, 11:54 am)
        Pretty much my point all along. Like every other profession, - there are good companies (Views: 532, 2024-07-22, 8:14 pm)
        The point is, you guys really got a hard on for the CRs. - The point, I wonder if any of you would stand (Views: 433, 2024-07-22, 8:11 pm)
        The post is about CRs and those that do not hold up to - the credentials (Views: 502, 2024-07-22, 8:22 pm)
        Point is, the post is about what a poster wants it to be - and what a poster wants to say (Views: 448, 2024-07-23, 9:34 am)
        No, the post was nothing but a bitch fest about - CRs and a disgruntled employee (Views: 447, 2024-07-23, 9:36 am)
        Or the OP is telling what they have experienced - and (Views: 393, 2024-07-28, 11:33 am)
        Wow, girl. Who crapped in your cornflakes. You accuse - others of exactly what you are doing (Views: 418, 2024-07-28, 2:02 pm)
        I consider most of the above posts to be off the wall - as well (Views: 375, 2024-07-28, 2:31 pm)
        You post nothing similar to poster your are attacking. Just crazy, off the rails comments - Moving onto to something (Views: 435, 2024-07-28, 2:45 pm)
        Yeah. You keep showing how pleasant you are - sm (Views: 412, 2024-07-28, 2:49 pm)
        I REALLY feel sorry for you. You are so pitifully consumed - with anger and jealousy that it is (Views: 379, 2024-07-28, 2:21 pm)
        I know right. How dare I post something similar - to your own posts (Views: 428, 2024-07-28, 2:26 pm)
        Seems there is one, especially, on this board that is jealous - of your good fortune (Views: 411, 2024-07-28, 2:09 pm)
        Passive aggressive. - sm (Views: 522, 2024-07-28, 2:38 pm)
        You proved the point of the poster you constantly attack - Grow up or get some help (Views: 432, 2024-07-28, 2:43 pm)
        And you keep on proving the point as well. You're doing - a great job (Views: 387, 2024-07-28, 2:45 pm)
        ^^ Guess things are slow on the Politics board. Seems you toggle - back and forth to spread your hate^^ (Views: 461, 2024-07-28, 2:47 pm)
        Oh, the star gazing lady. I'm not a politics board - kind of person (Views: 460, 2024-07-28, 2:52 pm)
        Of course, the brutality of some the posts - here (Views: 489, 2024-07-22, 9:25 pm)
        Again, point is, you and the other ball breakers of the CRs - do not get to tell everyone else (Views: 435, 2024-07-23, 9:32 am)
        People are standing up to the criticism and - scrutiny (Views: 533, 2024-07-23, 10:04 am)
        Hahahahaha, what a bogus post. No one able to - scrutinize your work. Your post useless