Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

What do you expect, you people attack a person - and then

Posted: Jul 19th, 2024 - 7:03 am In Reply to: Well, that is not what this thread was. It was one person - making a statement as if all

when they try to defend themself, you keep on attacking. This statement "Sounds to me like you were rejected by legal companies for not being up to standard and able to perform the job duties and posted this garbage since none of your post rings true." is an attack on a person. You can call it boasting, but if you're going to be attacked in that way, you're going to be defensive. Legal transcription companies are no different than medical transcription companies, put someone's ass in the seat so the job gets done and they can make their money. "High-octane, well-established, high-paying, professional organization," is just another company out there making a buck off a typist. You're trained to read the CR's notes, put the right speaker in the position, and type like a monkey like the rest of us. It's a typist's job. It requires you're not an idiot and you're not going to type than rather than then, etc. You don't know all the courter reporters in the US, you haven't typed all the CRs in the US, you haven't worked for every legal transcription company in the US, so your experience is different than someone else's. No need to personally attack someone about theirs and that's what's being done when you personally talk to someone as though they have no idea what they are doing in their job because they gave a negative review about court reporters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

You should all check into getting a job as a court reporter - as (Views: 1121, 2024-07-18, 8:42 am)
- I do court reporting and have for a great number of years. - Sad you work for such low quality company (Views: 908, 2024-07-18, 8:53 am)
  - Lucky you! There's no rejection, just a lot of BS with doing - legal (Views: 788, 2024-07-18, 9:16 am)
    - Do not need your warnings; they are bogus. I work - for a quality company with quality (Views: 821, 2024-07-18, 9:21 am)
      - Again, bad mouthing me isn't going to change - the fact (Views: 689, 2024-07-18, 9:24 am)
        Again, bad mouthing others because you work in a poor - environment does not change the facts (Views: 703, 2024-07-18, 9:31 am)
        Yeah, you're just a ball buster taking offense to something - because (Views: 705, 2024-07-18, 9:43 am)
        And you resort to name calling and abuse simply - because you, by your own admission, (Views: 736, 2024-07-18, 10:05 am)
        Your posts are nothing but a bunch of cutdowns - so (Views: 677, 2024-07-18, 10:15 am)
        Check yourself. Just because you have a bad job and - bad experience, it is not like that for (Views: 616, 2024-07-18, 5:44 pm)
        Superior knowledge doesn't have a thing to do with - typing (Views: 684, 2024-07-18, 10:02 am)
        So instead of complaing, why are you not working - for a high quality company. (Views: 712, 2024-07-18, 10:07 am)
        I don't have a list of quality companies - sm (Views: 735, 2024-07-18, 10:17 am)
        Your lack of a quality list is a reflection on you, no one else. - If you are so good, no reason (Views: 650, 2024-07-18, 5:37 pm)
        This conversation is just off the charts - sm (Views: 640, 2024-07-18, 8:09 pm)
        Well, that is not what this thread was. It was one person - making a statement as if all (Views: 657, 2024-07-18, 8:41 pm)
        This is too funny. I am a court reporter doing legal - transcription (Views: 698, 2024-07-18, 9:03 pm)
        What do you expect, you people attack a person - and then
        Notice you skipped over the one that started all the attacking - Same one writing the original post (Views: 685, 2024-07-19, 8:46 am)
        I told the person they were a ball buster because I - am a man (Views: 592, 2024-07-19, 9:06 am)
        You started the namecalling. No one gives a damn why. - Then you act as if you are above the fray (Views: 600, 2024-07-19, 9:13 am)
        The name calling started when "it sounds to me like - etc (Views: 587, 2024-07-19, 9:22 am)
        The company I work for is a quality company. - they (Views: 658, 2024-07-19, 7:16 am)
        so...what does this have to do with a list - Nothing (Views: 616, 2024-07-19, 8:45 am)
        Man, you people are brutal with the snotty comments - sm (Views: 538, 2024-07-19, 8:48 am)
        taking a page out of your play book - ... (Views: 543, 2024-07-19, 8:59 am)
        Too many of you act like big babies, looking for any reason - to be offended. Put your big girl panties on (Views: 627, 2024-07-19, 9:09 am)
        No one is asking you for a job, sweetheart - nm (Views: 555, 2024-07-19, 9:15 am)
        ^^Well sweetheart, that is not what the post said - Now you cannot read^^ (Views: 564, 2024-07-19, 9:20 am)
  - Bad mouthing me isn't going to change the CR profression - and the lack (Views: 557, 2024-07-18, 9:22 am)
    - Continually bad mouthing those with solid experience - and great capabilities does not (Views: 667, 2024-07-18, 9:36 am)
      - Yeah. It doesn't take a whole lot of education to turn on a - recording device. (Views: 531, 2024-07-18, 9:45 am)
        Proves your ignorance of the field - Not surpiring. (Views: 543, 2024-07-18, 10:05 am)
        There's no ignorance, just experience - nm (Views: 590, 2024-07-18, 10:20 am)
        Not really. A reporter's job is to take down - the record (Views: 633, 2024-07-18, 10:33 am)
        More blah, blah, blah from the would-be - wannabe court reporter (Views: 587, 2024-07-18, 5:45 pm)
      - Hey, you got a list of companies with these - professional (Views: 676, 2024-07-18, 9:49 am)
        With your snotty, name calling, and abusive attitude, do your own - research. (Views: 604, 2024-07-18, 10:10 am)
        You're the only one calling me names - and lashing (Views: 603, 2024-07-18, 10:22 am)
        Try reading what you wrote. You definitely started with - the name calling and abuse. This is EXACTLY what (Views: 590, 2024-07-18, 5:33 pm)
  - Oh, lord, transcription companies for legal have - nothing to do (Views: 693, 2024-07-18, 4:10 pm)
    - If that is all you are getting paid, then that is - your doing, not the CR. (Views: 612, 2024-07-18, 6:01 pm)
  - Isn't that the truth. There are low quality companies - out there (Views: 593, 2024-07-18, 10:38 pm)
    - I work for both. Occasionally, you get a poor audio - but that happens so seldom (Views: 560, 2024-07-19, 8:44 am)
- There are many states that don't require mandatory - certification (Views: 689, 2024-07-18, 11:00 am)
- I've had read backs that were just brutal - because (Views: 623, 2024-07-18, 11:18 am)
  - Or the attorneys who didn't realize it was just recorded .. - anon (Views: 4501, 2024-07-18, 1:40 pm)
    - Yeah. Some of them are calling themselves digital reporters - now, (Views: 552, 2024-07-18, 2:33 pm)
- Here are some good notes for you - sm (Views: 634, 2024-07-18, 12:28 pm)
  - These are annotations, not CR notes. - You (Views: 643, 2024-07-18, 5:51 pm)
    - No, these are the notes - it is (Views: 575, 2024-07-18, 7:49 pm)
      - These are annotations. You can name it whatever you like. - They are annotations (Views: 652, 2024-07-18, 8:50 pm)
        Annotations are explanations. The actual words that were - being said (Views: 594, 2024-07-18, 10:45 pm)
    - Here you go, honey, a few more for you. These are not annotations - sm (Views: 604, 2024-07-18, 8:16 pm)
    - ^^Well Honey, not interested in reading anymore of your - sad sack posts. I hear Walmart is hiring^^ (Views: 647, 2024-07-18, 8:43 pm)
- MaxScribe is the VR for court reporting, so the CR - can sit back (Views: 667, 2024-07-19, 7:06 am)
  - I have used MaxScribe extensively. It is a very good - program. Unlike what some on here claim, (Views: 824, 2024-07-19, 8:55 am)
    - I know what annotations are. The CR notes that - I receive (Views: 666, 2024-07-19, 9:13 am)
    - Don't get me wrong, the CR did annotate the time stamp, the speaker - and (Views: 722, 2024-07-19, 9:34 am)
  - This is not the only program - there are several (Views: 536, 2024-07-19, 9:04 am)
- Not sure why some of you working in MaxScribe and other VR programs - for legal (Views: 743, 2024-07-20, 12:02 pm)
  - As you, people can post whatever they like. Seems you are - not aware, but using one function (Views: 583, 2024-07-21, 2:42 pm)
    - My notes are on the right side. Clearly, you are right - there is no reason, sm (Views: 525, 2024-07-22, 8:46 am)
    - Since MaxScribe utilizes Phoenix OnDemand voice recognition - there would (Views: 659, 2024-07-22, 8:59 am)
      - So what is your point. Some CRs still provide notes - even with MaxScribe. So what (Views: 532, 2024-07-22, 12:52 pm)
        The point is having a whole document of VR words and having - a word or two (Views: 577, 2024-07-22, 1:47 pm)
        The point is - sm (Views: 581, 2024-07-22, 1:57 pm)
        the CR profession has several sides - anon (Views: 575, 2024-07-22, 4:31 pm)
        Some court reporters work for court reporting agencies - and not all (Views: 603, 2024-07-22, 7:36 pm)
        not all CR agencies - use legal transcription companies (Views: 595, 2024-07-23, 11:29 am)
        Yes, some do and some do not. There's a big argument - here about (Views: 578, 2024-07-23, 2:14 pm)
        I agree. - anon (Views: 448, 2024-07-23, 2:38 pm)
        This is a far better description than some of the other claptrap - posted on this site (Views: 513, 2024-07-23, 4:21 pm)
        CR's notes are the property of the court. No one - reports these (Views: 507, 2024-07-28, 11:54 am)
        Pretty much my point all along. Like every other profession, - there are good companies (Views: 713, 2024-07-22, 8:14 pm)
        The point is, you guys really got a hard on for the CRs. - The point, I wonder if any of you would stand (Views: 516, 2024-07-22, 8:11 pm)
        The post is about CRs and those that do not hold up to - the credentials (Views: 611, 2024-07-22, 8:22 pm)
        Point is, the post is about what a poster wants it to be - and what a poster wants to say (Views: 541, 2024-07-23, 9:34 am)
        No, the post was nothing but a bitch fest about - CRs and a disgruntled employee (Views: 604, 2024-07-23, 9:36 am)
        Or the OP is telling what they have experienced - and (Views: 541, 2024-07-28, 11:33 am)
        Wow, girl. Who crapped in your cornflakes. You accuse - others of exactly what you are doing (Views: 548, 2024-07-28, 2:02 pm)
        I consider most of the above posts to be off the wall - as well (Views: 458, 2024-07-28, 2:31 pm)
        You post nothing similar to poster your are attacking. Just crazy, off the rails comments - Moving onto to something (Views: 539, 2024-07-28, 2:45 pm)
        Yeah. You keep showing how pleasant you are - sm (Views: 511, 2024-07-28, 2:49 pm)
        I REALLY feel sorry for you. You are so pitifully consumed - with anger and jealousy that it is (Views: 461, 2024-07-28, 2:21 pm)
        I know right. How dare I post something similar - to your own posts (Views: 570, 2024-07-28, 2:26 pm)
        Seems there is one, especially, on this board that is jealous - of your good fortune (Views: 493, 2024-07-28, 2:09 pm)
        Passive aggressive. - sm (Views: 614, 2024-07-28, 2:38 pm)
        You proved the point of the poster you constantly attack - Grow up or get some help (Views: 534, 2024-07-28, 2:43 pm)
        And you keep on proving the point as well. You're doing - a great job (Views: 497, 2024-07-28, 2:45 pm)
        ^^ Guess things are slow on the Politics board. Seems you toggle - back and forth to spread your hate^^ (Views: 556, 2024-07-28, 2:47 pm)
        Oh, the star gazing lady. I'm not a politics board - kind of person (Views: 539, 2024-07-28, 2:52 pm)
        Of course, the brutality of some the posts - here (Views: 561, 2024-07-22, 9:25 pm)
        Again, point is, you and the other ball breakers of the CRs - do not get to tell everyone else (Views: 521, 2024-07-23, 9:32 am)
        People are standing up to the criticism and - scrutiny (Views: 612, 2024-07-23, 10:04 am)
        Hahahahaha, what a bogus post. No one able to - scrutinize your work. Your post useless (Views: 542, 2024-07-23, 10:55 am)