No, the post was nothing but a bitch fest about - CRs and a disgruntled employee

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

• You should all check into getting a job as a court reporter - as (Views: 955, 2024-07-18, 8:42 am)
  • I do court reporting and have for a great number of years. - Sad you work for such low quality company (Views: 779, 2024-07-18, 8:53 am)
    • Lucky you! There's no rejection, just a lot of BS with doing - legal (Views: 647, 2024-07-18, 9:16 am)
      • Do not need your warnings; they are bogus. I work - for a quality company with quality (Views: 708, 2024-07-18, 9:21 am)
        • Again, bad mouthing me isn't going to change - the fact (Views: 569, 2024-07-18, 9:24 am)
          • Again, bad mouthing others because you work in a poor - environment does not change the facts (Views: 560, 2024-07-18, 9:31 am)
            • Yeah, you're just a ball buster taking offense to something - because (Views: 613, 2024-07-18, 9:43 am)
              • And you resort to name calling and abuse simply - because you, by your own admission, (Views: 593, 2024-07-18, 10:05 am)
                • Your posts are nothing but a bunch of cutdowns - so (Views: 524, 2024-07-18, 10:15 am)
                  • Check yourself. Just because you have a bad job and - bad experience, it is not like that for (Views: 514, 2024-07-18, 5:44 pm)
            • Superior knowledge doesn't have a thing to do with - typing (Views: 574, 2024-07-18, 10:02 am)
              • So instead of complaing, why are you not working - for a high quality company. (Views: 541, 2024-07-18, 10:07 am)
                • I don't have a list of quality companies - sm (Views: 624, 2024-07-18, 10:17 am)
                  • Your lack of a quality list is a reflection on you, no one else. - If you are so good, no reason (Views: 540, 2024-07-18, 5:37 pm)
                    • This conversation is just off the charts - sm (Views: 540, 2024-07-18, 8:09 pm)
                      • Well, that is not what this thread was. It was one person - making a statement as if all (Views: 545, 2024-07-18, 8:41 pm)
                        • This is too funny. I am a court reporter doing legal - transcription (Views: 599, 2024-07-18, 9:03 pm)
                        • What do you expect, you people attack a person - and then (Views: 546, 2024-07-19, 7:03 am)
                          • Notice you skipped over the one that started all the attacking - Same one writing the original post (Views: 531, 2024-07-19, 8:46 am)
                            • I told the person they were a ball buster because I - am a man (Views: 447, 2024-07-19, 9:06 am)
                              • You started the namecalling. No one gives a damn why. - Then you act as if you are above the fray (Views: 476, 2024-07-19, 9:13 am)
                                • The name calling started when "it sounds to me like - etc (Views: 484, 2024-07-19, 9:22 am)
                    • The company I work for is a quality company. - they (Views: 566, 2024-07-19, 7:16 am)
                      • so...what does this have to do with a list - Nothing (Views: 517, 2024-07-19, 8:45 am)
                        • Man, you people are brutal with the snotty comments - sm (Views: 436, 2024-07-19, 8:48 am)
                          • taking a page out of your play book - ... (Views: 442, 2024-07-19, 8:59 am)
                          • Too many of you act like big babies, looking for any reason - to be offended. Put your big girl panties on (Views: 533, 2024-07-19, 9:09 am)
                            • No one is asking you for a job, sweetheart - nm (Views: 453, 2024-07-19, 9:15 am)
                            • ^^Well sweetheart, that is not what the post said - Now you cannot read^^ (Views: 470, 2024-07-19, 9:20 am)
    • Bad mouthing me isn't going to change the CR profression - and the lack (Views: 470, 2024-07-18, 9:22 am)
      • Continually bad mouthing those with solid experience - and great capabilities does not (Views: 571, 2024-07-18, 9:36 am)
        • Yeah. It doesn't take a whole lot of education to turn on a - recording device. (Views: 429, 2024-07-18, 9:45 am)
          • Proves your ignorance of the field - Not surpiring. (Views: 449, 2024-07-18, 10:05 am)
            • There's no ignorance, just experience - nm (Views: 465, 2024-07-18, 10:20 am)
            • Not really. A reporter's job is to take down - the record (Views: 541, 2024-07-18, 10:33 am)
              • More blah, blah, blah from the would-be - wannabe court reporter (Views: 483, 2024-07-18, 5:45 pm)
        • Hey, you got a list of companies with these - professional (Views: 539, 2024-07-18, 9:49 am)
          • With your snotty, name calling, and abusive attitude, do your own - research. (Views: 485, 2024-07-18, 10:10 am)
            • You're the only one calling me names - and lashing (Views: 506, 2024-07-18, 10:22 am)
              • Try reading what you wrote. You definitely started with - the name calling and abuse. This is EXACTLY what (Views: 486, 2024-07-18, 5:33 pm)
    • Oh, lord, transcription companies for legal have - nothing to do (Views: 589, 2024-07-18, 4:10 pm)
      • If that is all you are getting paid, then that is - your doing, not the CR. (Views: 511, 2024-07-18, 6:01 pm)
    • Isn't that the truth. There are low quality companies - out there (Views: 494, 2024-07-18, 10:38 pm)
      • I work for both. Occasionally, you get a poor audio - but that happens so seldom (Views: 457, 2024-07-19, 8:44 am)
  • There are many states that don't require mandatory - certification (Views: 520, 2024-07-18, 11:00 am)
  • I've had read backs that were just brutal - because (Views: 515, 2024-07-18, 11:18 am)
    • Or the attorneys who didn't realize it was just recorded .. - anon (Views: 1815, 2024-07-18, 1:40 pm)
      • Yeah. Some of them are calling themselves digital reporters - now, (Views: 458, 2024-07-18, 2:33 pm)
  • Here are some good notes for you - sm (Views: 525, 2024-07-18, 12:28 pm)
    • These are annotations, not CR notes. - You (Views: 525, 2024-07-18, 5:51 pm)
      • No, these are the notes - it is (Views: 479, 2024-07-18, 7:49 pm)
        • These are annotations. You can name it whatever you like. - They are annotations (Views: 522, 2024-07-18, 8:50 pm)
          • Annotations are explanations. The actual words that were - being said (Views: 503, 2024-07-18, 10:45 pm)
      • Here you go, honey, a few more for you. These are not annotations - sm (Views: 507, 2024-07-18, 8:16 pm)
      • ^^Well Honey, not interested in reading anymore of your - sad sack posts. I hear Walmart is hiring^^ (Views: 544, 2024-07-18, 8:43 pm)
  • MaxScribe is the VR for court reporting, so the CR - can sit back (Views: 520, 2024-07-19, 7:06 am)
    • I have used MaxScribe extensively. It is a very good - program. Unlike what some on here claim, (Views: 564, 2024-07-19, 8:55 am)
      • I know what annotations are. The CR notes that - I receive (Views: 557, 2024-07-19, 9:13 am)
      • Don't get me wrong, the CR did annotate the time stamp, the speaker - and (Views: 609, 2024-07-19, 9:34 am)
    • This is not the only program - there are several (Views: 436, 2024-07-19, 9:04 am)
  • Not sure why some of you working in MaxScribe and other VR programs - for legal (Views: 546, 2024-07-20, 12:02 pm)
    • As you, people can post whatever they like. Seems you are - not aware, but using one function (Views: 478, 2024-07-21, 2:42 pm)
      • My notes are on the right side. Clearly, you are right - there is no reason, sm (Views: 408, 2024-07-22, 8:46 am)
      • Since MaxScribe utilizes Phoenix OnDemand voice recognition - there would (Views: 491, 2024-07-22, 8:59 am)
        • So what is your point. Some CRs still provide notes - even with MaxScribe. So what (Views: 411, 2024-07-22, 12:52 pm)
          • The point is having a whole document of VR words and having - a word or two (Views: 450, 2024-07-22, 1:47 pm)
          • The point is - sm (Views: 492, 2024-07-22, 1:57 pm)
            • the CR profession has several sides - anon (Views: 479, 2024-07-22, 4:31 pm)
              • Some court reporters work for court reporting agencies - and not all (Views: 499, 2024-07-22, 7:36 pm)
                • not all CR agencies - use legal transcription companies (Views: 494, 2024-07-23, 11:29 am)
                  • Yes, some do and some do not. There's a big argument - here about (Views: 469, 2024-07-23, 2:14 pm)
                    • I agree. - anon (Views: 368, 2024-07-23, 2:38 pm)
                  • This is a far better description than some of the other claptrap - posted on this site (Views: 427, 2024-07-23, 4:21 pm)
                  • CR's notes are the property of the court. No one - reports these (Views: 418, 2024-07-28, 11:54 am)
              • Pretty much my point all along. Like every other profession, - there are good companies (Views: 532, 2024-07-22, 8:14 pm)
            • The point is, you guys really got a hard on for the CRs. - The point, I wonder if any of you would stand (Views: 433, 2024-07-22, 8:11 pm)
              • The post is about CRs and those that do not hold up to - the credentials (Views: 502, 2024-07-22, 8:22 pm)
                • Point is, the post is about what a poster wants it to be - and what a poster wants to say (Views: 448, 2024-07-23, 9:34 am)
                • No, the post was nothing but a bitch fest about - CRs and a disgruntled employee
                  • Or the OP is telling what they have experienced - and (Views: 393, 2024-07-28, 11:33 am)
                    • Wow, girl. Who crapped in your cornflakes. You accuse - others of exactly what you are doing (Views: 418, 2024-07-28, 2:02 pm)
                      • I consider most of the above posts to be off the wall - as well (Views: 375, 2024-07-28, 2:31 pm)
                        • You post nothing similar to poster your are attacking. Just crazy, off the rails comments - Moving onto to something (Views: 435, 2024-07-28, 2:45 pm)
                          • Yeah. You keep showing how pleasant you are - sm (Views: 412, 2024-07-28, 2:49 pm)
                    • I REALLY feel sorry for you. You are so pitifully consumed - with anger and jealousy that it is (Views: 379, 2024-07-28, 2:21 pm)
                      • I know right. How dare I post something similar - to your own posts (Views: 428, 2024-07-28, 2:26 pm)
                  • Seems there is one, especially, on this board that is jealous - of your good fortune (Views: 411, 2024-07-28, 2:09 pm)
                    • Passive aggressive. - sm (Views: 522, 2024-07-28, 2:38 pm)
                      • You proved the point of the poster you constantly attack - Grow up or get some help (Views: 432, 2024-07-28, 2:43 pm)
                        • And you keep on proving the point as well. You're doing - a great job (Views: 386, 2024-07-28, 2:45 pm)
                        • ^^ Guess things are slow on the Politics board. Seems you toggle - back and forth to spread your hate^^ (Views: 461, 2024-07-28, 2:47 pm)
                          • Oh, the star gazing lady. I'm not a politics board - kind of person (Views: 460, 2024-07-28, 2:52 pm)
              • Of course, the brutality of some the posts - here (Views: 489, 2024-07-22, 9:25 pm)
                • Again, point is, you and the other ball breakers of the CRs - do not get to tell everyone else (Views: 435, 2024-07-23, 9:32 am)
                  • People are standing up to the criticism and - scrutiny (Views: 533, 2024-07-23, 10:04 am)
                    • Hahahahaha, what a bogus post. No one able to - scrutinize your work. Your post useless (Views: 446, 2024-07-23, 10:55 am)

• Latest Posts
• Unanswered
• Top Viewed
• Most Discussed
• Most Liked