Thank you very much, Nick!

Thank you very much, Nick! - sm

Posted:

In Reply to:

Re: Statutory employees

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Ad on job board: - sm (Views: 1820, 2015-12-15, 3:26 pm)

Yes! - anon (Views: 1321, 2015-12-15, 7:11 pm)
- And the verdict... - Anon (Views: 1466, 2015-12-15, 8:14 pm)
  - "Require ICs to work certain hours." She really doesn't know anything about - the laws regarding IC. (Views: 1365, 2015-12-16, 6:21 am)
    - Nice try. - anon (Views: 1329, 2015-12-16, 6:49 am)
      - I think you replied to the wrong post...? - nm (Views: 1412, 2015-12-16, 8:16 am)
        ? - anon (Views: 1059, 2015-12-16, 8:20 am)
        Unless... - anon (Views: 1323, 2015-12-16, 8:22 am)
        ? anon - Nick (Views: 1314, 2015-12-16, 8:57 am)
        Exactly Nick! Quote, "I'm so glad I don't - live in your body". (Views: 1123, 2015-12-16, 9:04 am)
        How old is she? - Nick (Views: 1027, 2015-12-16, 9:09 am)
        I posted the one you replied to, quoting what the owner - sm (Views: 1036, 2015-12-16, 8:58 am)
    - BTW... - anon (Views: 2170, 2015-12-16, 6:52 am)
      - What happens to a company when they - want ICs to work (Views: 1137, 2015-12-16, 8:31 am)
        Yes... - anon (Views: 972, 2015-12-16, 8:39 am)
      - BTW - Nick (Views: 980, 2015-12-16, 9:05 am)
    - And not only the Labor Board - Former MTSO (Views: 1032, 2015-12-16, 8:52 am)
  - And the verdict - Nick (Views: 1311, 2015-12-16, 8:50 am)
    - I wish I could "Like" this post a thousand times. - People need to start standing up SM (Views: 849, 2015-12-16, 9:37 am)
      - Yep, you are right! - Nick (Views: 1123, 2015-12-16, 1:38 pm)
  - IC hours - katina (Views: 1240, 2015-12-16, 9:06 am)
    - Katina - Nick (Views: 1047, 2015-12-16, 9:16 am)
- Yes! - Old Pro (Views: 908, 2015-12-16, 8:39 am)
  - She removed ad but... - anon (Views: 1230, 2015-12-16, 8:43 am)
    - Good for you! I thought her response was - very unprofessional and (Views: 1079, 2015-12-16, 8:49 am)
      - Yes, Good for Her! And remember - Old Pro (Views: 1178, 2015-12-16, 9:23 am)
      - Good for you! - Long-time MT (Views: 783, 2015-12-17, 8:44 am)
    - Good for you - Old Pro (Views: 924, 2015-12-16, 9:21 am)
    - FANTASTIC!!!!!!!!! Thank you for standing up - for yourself!!!!!!!! nm (Views: 855, 2015-12-16, 9:40 am)
  - What about a company - sm (Views: 1090, 2015-12-16, 8:46 am)
    - Yep... - anon (Views: 1157, 2015-12-16, 8:49 am)
      - Did you continue to work there even - when you found out? (Views: 958, 2015-12-16, 8:51 am)
        No... - anon (Views: 848, 2015-12-16, 9:09 am)
    - A company who offshores without telling - Nick (Views: 878, 2015-12-16, 1:47 pm)

And also apparently - Nick (Views: 1146, 2015-12-16, 8:36 am)
- She claims she did this because sometimes - her clients want a (Views: 940, 2015-12-16, 9:00 am)
  - I think MTs put up with this and work under - these conditions (Views: 950, 2015-12-16, 9:10 am)
    - I did this - office girl (Views: 962, 2015-12-16, 10:41 am)
  - When she tells you she wants impossible things, tell her - Nick (Views: 1046, 2015-12-16, 9:25 am)
- For Nick-what about statutory employees? - sm (Views: 859, 2015-12-16, 4:37 pm)
  - Re: Statutory employees - Nick (Views: 1041, 2015-12-16, 6:17 pm)
    - Thank you very much, Nick! - sm
      - You are welcome - Nick (Views: 851, 2015-12-16, 8:10 pm)
    - One more agency to contact - Nick (Views: 847, 2015-12-17, 10:40 am)

Here is the official info from Montana Secretary of State - Phantom (Views: 1401, 2015-12-16, 1:27 pm)
- I have a feeling that status reason may not be true much longer ;-) - no message (Views: 915, 2016-01-06, 4:09 pm)

Were they from Omaha? - Curious (Views: 696, 2015-12-22, 6:47 pm)

Thank you very much, Nick! - sm

Post A Reply

Reply By Email