Unless... - anon

Posted: Dec 16th, 2015 - 8:22 am In Reply to: ? - anon

the above is someone agreeing? I took it to be her here again trolling, after her response to me initially.

Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Ad on job board: - sm (Views: 1771, 2015-12-15, 3:26 pm)
- Yes! - anon (Views: 1275, 2015-12-15, 7:11 pm)
  - And the verdict... - Anon (Views: 1424, 2015-12-15, 8:14 pm)
    - "Require ICs to work certain hours." She really doesn't know anything about - the laws regarding IC. (Views: 1320, 2015-12-16, 6:21 am)
      - Nice try. - anon (Views: 1281, 2015-12-16, 6:49 am)
        I think you replied to the wrong post...? - nm (Views: 1366, 2015-12-16, 8:16 am)
        ? - anon (Views: 993, 2015-12-16, 8:20 am)
        Unless... - anon
        ? anon - Nick (Views: 1268, 2015-12-16, 8:57 am)
        Exactly Nick! Quote, "I'm so glad I don't - live in your body". (Views: 1073, 2015-12-16, 9:04 am)
        How old is she? - Nick (Views: 977, 2015-12-16, 9:09 am)
        I posted the one you replied to, quoting what the owner - sm (Views: 985, 2015-12-16, 8:58 am)
      - BTW... - anon (Views: 2083, 2015-12-16, 6:52 am)
        What happens to a company when they - want ICs to work (Views: 1090, 2015-12-16, 8:31 am)
        Yes... - anon (Views: 904, 2015-12-16, 8:39 am)
        BTW - Nick (Views: 935, 2015-12-16, 9:05 am)
      - And not only the Labor Board - Former MTSO (Views: 990, 2015-12-16, 8:52 am)
    - And the verdict - Nick (Views: 1262, 2015-12-16, 8:50 am)
      - I wish I could "Like" this post a thousand times. - People need to start standing up SM (Views: 797, 2015-12-16, 9:37 am)
        Yep, you are right! - Nick (Views: 1073, 2015-12-16, 1:38 pm)
    - IC hours - katina (Views: 1097, 2015-12-16, 9:06 am)
      - Katina - Nick (Views: 998, 2015-12-16, 9:16 am)
  - Yes! - Old Pro (Views: 862, 2015-12-16, 8:39 am)
    - She removed ad but... - anon (Views: 1181, 2015-12-16, 8:43 am)
      - Good for you! I thought her response was - very unprofessional and (Views: 1015, 2015-12-16, 8:49 am)
        Yes, Good for Her! And remember - Old Pro (Views: 1123, 2015-12-16, 9:23 am)
        Good for you! - Long-time MT (Views: 736, 2015-12-17, 8:44 am)
      - Good for you - Old Pro (Views: 876, 2015-12-16, 9:21 am)
      - FANTASTIC!!!!!!!!! Thank you for standing up - for yourself!!!!!!!! nm (Views: 808, 2015-12-16, 9:40 am)
    - What about a company - sm (Views: 1041, 2015-12-16, 8:46 am)
      - Yep... - anon (Views: 1112, 2015-12-16, 8:49 am)
        Did you continue to work there even - when you found out? (Views: 909, 2015-12-16, 8:51 am)
        No... - anon (Views: 801, 2015-12-16, 9:09 am)
      - A company who offshores without telling - Nick (Views: 831, 2015-12-16, 1:47 pm)
- And also apparently - Nick (Views: 1102, 2015-12-16, 8:36 am)
  - She claims she did this because sometimes - her clients want a (Views: 870, 2015-12-16, 9:00 am)
    - I think MTs put up with this and work under - these conditions (Views: 904, 2015-12-16, 9:10 am)
      - I did this - office girl (Views: 920, 2015-12-16, 10:41 am)
    - When she tells you she wants impossible things, tell her - Nick (Views: 998, 2015-12-16, 9:25 am)
  - For Nick-what about statutory employees? - sm (Views: 804, 2015-12-16, 4:37 pm)
    - Re: Statutory employees - Nick (Views: 965, 2015-12-16, 6:17 pm)
      - Thank you very much, Nick! - sm (Views: 738, 2015-12-16, 7:35 pm)
        You are welcome - Nick (Views: 803, 2015-12-16, 8:10 pm)
      - One more agency to contact - Nick (Views: 793, 2015-12-17, 10:40 am)
- Here is the official info from Montana Secretary of State - Phantom (Views: 1347, 2015-12-16, 1:27 pm)
  - I have a feeling that status reason may not be true much longer ;-) - no message (Views: 862, 2016-01-06, 4:09 pm)
- Were they from Omaha? - Curious (Views: 648, 2015-12-22, 6:47 pm)

Unless... - anon

Post A Reply

Reply By Email