Good for you! I thought her response was - very unprofessional and

Reply By Email Options

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

• Ad on job board: - sm (Views: 1772, 2015-12-15, 3:26 pm)
  • Yes! - anon (Views: 1275, 2015-12-15, 7:11 pm)
    • And the verdict... - Anon (Views: 1424, 2015-12-15, 8:14 pm)
      • "Require ICs to work certain hours." She really doesn't know anything about - the laws regarding IC. (Views: 1321, 2015-12-16, 6:21 am)
        • Nice try. - anon (Views: 1282, 2015-12-16, 6:49 am)
          • I think you replied to the wrong post...? - nm (Views: 1366, 2015-12-16, 8:16 am)
            • ? - anon (Views: 993, 2015-12-16, 8:20 am)
              • Unless... - anon (Views: 1269, 2015-12-16, 8:22 am)
              • ? anon - Nick (Views: 1268, 2015-12-16, 8:57 am)
                • Exactly Nick! Quote, "I'm so glad I don't - live in your body". (Views: 1074, 2015-12-16, 9:04 am)
                  • How old is she? - Nick (Views: 978, 2015-12-16, 9:09 am)
              • I posted the one you replied to, quoting what the owner - sm (Views: 985, 2015-12-16, 8:58 am)
        • BTW... - anon (Views: 2083, 2015-12-16, 6:52 am)
          • What happens to a company when they - want ICs to work (Views: 1090, 2015-12-16, 8:31 am)
            • Yes... - anon (Views: 904, 2015-12-16, 8:39 am)
          • BTW - Nick (Views: 936, 2015-12-16, 9:05 am)
        • And not only the Labor Board - Former MTSO (Views: 990, 2015-12-16, 8:52 am)
      • And the verdict - Nick (Views: 1263, 2015-12-16, 8:50 am)
        • I wish I could "Like" this post a thousand times. - People need to start standing up SM (Views: 797, 2015-12-16, 9:37 am)
          • Yep, you are right! - Nick (Views: 1074, 2015-12-16, 1:38 pm)
      • IC hours - katina (Views: 1098, 2015-12-16, 9:06 am)
        • Katina - Nick (Views: 998, 2015-12-16, 9:16 am)
    • Yes! - Old Pro (Views: 862, 2015-12-16, 8:39 am)
      • She removed ad but... - anon (Views: 1182, 2015-12-16, 8:43 am)
        • Good for you! I thought her response was - very unprofessional and
          • Yes, Good for Her! And remember - Old Pro (Views: 1123, 2015-12-16, 9:23 am)
          • Good for you! - Long-time MT (Views: 737, 2015-12-17, 8:44 am)
        • Good for you - Old Pro (Views: 877, 2015-12-16, 9:21 am)
        • FANTASTIC!!!!!!!!! Thank you for standing up - for yourself!!!!!!!! nm (Views: 809, 2015-12-16, 9:40 am)
      • What about a company - sm (Views: 1041, 2015-12-16, 8:46 am)
        • Yep... - anon (Views: 1112, 2015-12-16, 8:49 am)
          • Did you continue to work there even - when you found out? (Views: 910, 2015-12-16, 8:51 am)
            • No... - anon (Views: 801, 2015-12-16, 9:09 am)
        • A company who offshores without telling - Nick (Views: 832, 2015-12-16, 1:47 pm)
  • And also apparently - Nick (Views: 1102, 2015-12-16, 8:36 am)
    • She claims she did this because sometimes - her clients want a (Views: 870, 2015-12-16, 9:00 am)
      • I think MTs put up with this and work under - these conditions (Views: 904, 2015-12-16, 9:10 am)
        • I did this - office girl (Views: 920, 2015-12-16, 10:41 am)
      • When she tells you she wants impossible things, tell her - Nick (Views: 999, 2015-12-16, 9:25 am)
    • For Nick-what about statutory employees? - sm (Views: 805, 2015-12-16, 4:37 pm)
      • Re: Statutory employees - Nick (Views: 966, 2015-12-16, 6:17 pm)
        • Thank you very much, Nick! - sm (Views: 738, 2015-12-16, 7:35 pm)
          • You are welcome - Nick (Views: 804, 2015-12-16, 8:10 pm)
        • One more agency to contact - Nick (Views: 793, 2015-12-17, 10:40 am)
  • Here is the official info from Montana Secretary of State - Phantom (Views: 1348, 2015-12-16, 1:27 pm)
    • I have a feeling that status reason may not be true much longer ;-) - no message (Views: 862, 2016-01-06, 4:09 pm)
  • Were they from Omaha? - Curious (Views: 648, 2015-12-22, 6:47 pm)

• Latest Posts
• Unanswered
• Top Viewed
• Most Discussed
• Most Liked