But it is ironic that the tenor of this conversation - has changed from how Posted: May 17th, 2016 - 11:57 am In Reply to: LOL - You think a lot of us didnt think
much you were making, and your big bonuses, to how cheaply you can do the work. It would not seem possible for it to be both.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
- Fellow MTs, QAs, QA for ILPs please help piece together - what has been happening (Views: 1175, 2016-05-15, 9:48 pm)
- timeline - JuneBugMTMS (Views: 1042, 2016-05-15, 10:59 pm)
- I used to make $80,000/yr, just filed bankruptcy - my story is all over these archives. nm (Views: 939, 2016-05-16, 6:36 am)
- You were grossly overpaid - You can not possibly (Views: 1250, 2016-05-16, 9:37 am)
- 80k does sound high, but I'm guessing she - worked much more than 40 (Views: 803, 2016-05-16, 12:12 pm)
- $80,000.00 - suthern girl (Views: 1148, 2016-05-16, 5:15 pm)
- No, the objection is that you are saying - that a transcriptionist (Views: 883, 2016-05-16, 6:03 pm)
- what a transcriptionist makes - suthern girl (Views: 732, 2016-05-17, 12:24 am)
- I did not mention a lot of professions - My comment was not (Views: 796, 2016-05-17, 7:10 am)
- Nobody thinks that, she said she MADE that - we DO deserve more though (Views: 686, 2016-05-17, 10:47 am)
- Actually the first response said that - when she said (Views: 765, 2016-05-17, 11:28 am)
- There was NEVER a case where everybody - made $80,000 each and caused outsourcing (Views: 790, 2016-05-17, 11:33 am)
- You did not work any harder than the - in house transcriptionists (Views: 776, 2016-05-17, 11:40 am)
- LOL - You think a lot of us didnt think (Views: 685, 2016-05-17, 11:51 am)
- LOL - I am kind of in the know (Views: 718, 2016-05-17, 11:55 am)
- But it is ironic that the tenor of this conversation - has changed from how
|
