I've read this over and over and from what I see - sm Posted: Jan 3rd, 2016 - 1:22 pm In Reply to: This... - anon
the client has every right to cancel a contract if work is not in TAT. Everybody's got their panties in a wad but nobody mentions if the work was in TAT or not. If not, then that falls on Lee which, unfortunately, ultimately falls on the MTs (for not working the 120 hours a week they expect of you which you should have known if you've been in this business any length of time). You could have worked until your fingers bled with no hope of ever being in TAT, having been set up to fail from the get-go. Lee's not the only game in town that plays dirty. Say good riddance and consider it a lesson learned. I'm sorry it happened to you.
Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
- Wow Lee Perfect.... - anon (Views: 2021, 2015-12-31, 11:23 am)
- What happened? Did they say? - nm (Views: 919, 2015-12-31, 12:27 pm)
- This... - anon (Views: 1325, 2015-12-31, 12:34 pm)
- Wow... - never ceases to...frustrate (Views: 1050, 2016-01-01, 10:37 am)
- I've read this over and over and from what I see - sm
- So sorry!! - gsd (Views: 717, 2016-01-01, 10:07 am)
|
