YOU have no proof she did not provide the work paid - for. Prove you have access to her QA scores

Posted: Jun 19th, 2021 - 2:53 pm In Reply to: ok, I paid extremely well, too - retired

I believe you make a lot of erroneous assumptions trying to appears as if you have inside knowledge -- Is that you CK?

I believe your posts are nothing more than your attempt to bolster your own self importance. I believe you falsely state the OP did not deliver quality work - You have no prove of what you post. GROW UP!

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Beware of Christl King w/ First Class Medical Transcription - Scammed (Views: 1028, 2021-06-18, 4:41 pm)
- Thank you for the warning! - SM (Views: 789, 2021-06-18, 6:24 pm)
- I agree with other poster. I, too, do massive IME work - and would probably have responded - HWMT (Views: 602, 2021-06-18, 7:06 pm)
- Are these people looking to hire also MTs? - if so, (Views: 594, 2021-06-18, 7:29 pm)
  - That is exactly what they are trying to do - Then, they use that MTs work product (Views: 457, 2021-06-18, 7:37 pm)
    - I can almost guarantee that is not so! - retired (Views: 492, 2021-06-19, 2:21 pm)
      - I believe your post proves you to be the idiot you are - and I also believe you clearly have no (Views: 510, 2021-06-19, 2:45 pm)
        maybe I am an idiot BUT - retired (Views: 775, 2021-06-19, 2:52 pm)
        Not wasting my time on your self-inflated, hateful poss - I believe you owe the OP an apology (Views: 433, 2021-06-19, 2:59 pm)
      - Wow. Just WOW. - The idiocy runs rampant (Views: 641, 2021-06-19, 3:00 pm)
        I love your post! I agree there is no way for the "idiot" to - know what was contractually (Views: 403, 2021-06-19, 3:03 pm)
        I know what OP did because I read her post - retired (Views: 362, 2021-06-19, 3:09 pm)
        Again, how in the hell do you know ANY of this??? - Wow (Views: 571, 2021-06-19, 3:15 pm)
        ^^Not opening any more "retired" post - Just too damn goofy^^ (Views: 358, 2021-06-19, 3:13 pm)
        I believe you’re right. A member of crazytown has escaped - Peach (Views: 458, 2021-06-19, 7:28 pm)
      - I am the OP - Response (Views: 622, 2021-06-19, 4:28 pm)
        Good for you! - CMT (Views: 364, 2021-06-19, 6:41 pm)
      - Supoose or Suppose? You need to proofread LOLOLOL - nm (Views: 394, 2021-06-21, 3:34 pm)
        THAT IS NOT THE ONLY ERROR "RETIRED" MADE - AND SHE WAS ANGRY ABOUT (Views: 431, 2021-06-21, 3:39 pm)
        WAY too funny! - LOL (Views: 302, 2021-06-21, 4:16 pm)
  - OP wronged Ms. Lake twice! - Retired (Views: 722, 2021-06-19, 2:47 pm)
    - Please listen to the rest of us. I believe you ae CK trying r - hard to cause problems for OP (Views: 384, 2021-06-19, 2:50 pm)
      - no law degree, just a business woman - retired (Views: 630, 2021-06-19, 3:02 pm)
        Okay, "Ms, Lake" - LMAO (Views: 363, 2021-06-19, 3:08 pm)
        AGAIN, LOVE YOUR POST. Refuse to open any more - of those goofy posts from (Views: 439, 2021-06-19, 3:11 pm)
        EMPLOYER MISREPRESENTATION - anon (Views: 586, 2021-06-19, 7:55 pm)
        Then point out where OP said what you're saying..sm - NotRetired (Views: 332, 2021-06-26, 3:00 pm)
    - You don’t have to go back and listen to the whole damn report - Peach (Views: 651, 2021-06-19, 7:21 pm)
      - Exactly - That is just ludicrous (Views: 512, 2021-06-19, 8:58 pm)
        Agreed - Craziness (Views: 500, 2021-06-19, 10:55 pm)
    - Who is “Ms. Lake”? - Confused (Views: 700, 2021-06-19, 8:40 pm)
      - Perhaps Ms. King's last name is really "Lake" and - this person is her (Views: 491, 2021-06-21, 10:34 am)
    - who is Ms. Lake??? - sm (Views: 578, 2021-06-21, 10:32 am)
      - I have no idea who Ms. Lake is - OP (Views: 633, 2021-06-21, 5:37 pm)
- How awful - SM (Views: 502, 2021-06-18, 8:32 pm)
  - Grow up! OP breached her contract - retired (Views: 580, 2021-06-19, 2:38 pm)
    - I believe you are the libelous one. I believe you twist - the post to suit your inflated ideas of what (Views: 630, 2021-06-19, 2:48 pm)
    - In the interests of protecting Ms. Lake.... - Retired (aka MacroDiva) (Views: 646, 2021-06-19, 3:40 pm)
      - "Worthless work?" - Unreal (Views: 463, 2021-06-19, 3:47 pm)
      - YOU have no proof of what you wrote. Futhermore, - you berated OP for sub par work, but have (Views: 368, 2021-06-19, 5:22 pm)
      - DID A SEARCH FOR WordExpress Transcriptions - NO SUCH BUSINESS NAME. (Views: 779, 2021-06-19, 5:33 pm)
        You're right - No such thing (Views: 411, 2021-06-19, 5:45 pm)
- ok, I paid extremely well, too - retired (Views: 420, 2021-06-19, 1:00 pm)
  - YOU have no proof she did not provide the work paid - for. Prove you have access to her QA scores
- addendum - retired (Views: 432, 2021-06-19, 1:17 pm)
  - OM MY! You admitted your made a mistake!!! - Wow - and you are slamming others with your nonfac (Views: 358, 2021-06-19, 2:55 pm)
  - Sounds like a whole lot of unfulfilled expectations - from both (Views: 600, 2021-06-19, 5:16 pm)
- To the OP - SM (Views: 371, 2021-06-19, 4:02 pm)
- I wrote to you privately about this, and I really am glad - you took the steps to expose CK (Views: 401, 2021-06-19, 5:28 pm)
  - I would - Still (Views: 430, 2021-06-19, 5:30 pm)
    - I AGREE. I think it is one in the same - and she is so delusional, she believes that we bel (Views: 483, 2021-06-19, 5:35 pm)
    - Me, too! - Who is she? (Views: 373, 2021-06-19, 5:52 pm)
- Thank you for the warning! We need to call out all snakes - Peach (Views: 332, 2021-06-19, 7:23 pm)
- Report this to law enforcement for theft of services - SM (Views: 496, 2021-06-19, 11:09 pm)
  - I didn't report it to law enforcement, but - OP (Views: 391, 2021-06-20, 3:58 pm)