No, the issue was the poster stating unequivocal and - without exception Posted: May 8th, 2023 - 5:45 pm In Reply to: Having a union in your workplace - Blowhards unite
all were union members. There was no differentiation whatsoever as you try and claim now. You comprehend little of the written word.
Furthermore, it was stated as a fact, which is simply not correct.
"The people you mention belong to a union and there is no union for MTs. Someone brings this up every so often. That ship not only sailed, it has sunk." That is a direct quote. Not everyone in those jobs poster is referring to belong to a union. Clearly, she has no way of knowing how many in any of these categories are unionized. It was a total assumption on her part, as are most of her posts.
Flame away.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
- Strike - ltmt (Views: 1015, 2023-05-06, 12:30 pm)
- 8 cpl - MT70 (Views: 707, 2023-05-06, 3:32 pm)
- 8 cpl - Try 4 cpl (Views: 622, 2023-05-06, 4:02 pm)
|
