No 1099? - anon

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

• No 1099? - anon (Views: 841, 2016-04-14, 12:12 am)
  • I do not think the Federal Govt would like that - StillAnMT (Views: 553, 2016-04-14, 7:22 am)
    • If An - Employer (Views: 589, 2016-04-14, 8:46 am)
      • I totally disagree - StillAnMT (Views: 916, 2016-04-14, 9:32 am)
        • Ahem. All these laws apply only to US businesses and workers. - Heloise (Views: 539, 2016-04-14, 11:17 am)
          • Why would you assume that? We are talking US here. - nm (Views: 414, 2016-04-14, 8:09 pm)
            • Are you aware of how many companies operating in the US are - owned by offshore entities? SM (Views: 375, 2016-04-15, 9:20 am)
              • loopholes - StillAnMT (Views: 434, 2016-04-15, 10:13 am)
                • Closing these particular loopholes is not within the power of th IRS. - Heloise (Views: 567, 2016-04-15, 12:45 pm)
          • It makes no sense the Feds would allow that - StillAnMT (Views: 462, 2016-04-15, 8:52 am)
            • Okay, I won't say it. But that won't change the fact that they don't. - Heloise (Views: 479, 2016-04-15, 10:59 am)
        • Right on! - nm (Views: 435, 2016-04-14, 8:06 pm)
      • You are wrong. If a contractor is paid over $600.00 in - sm (Views: 419, 2016-04-14, 8:04 pm)
        • Absolutely right! - nm (Views: 385, 2016-04-15, 7:53 am)
  • no 1099 - OP (Views: 443, 2016-04-16, 5:59 pm)

• Latest Posts
• Unanswered
• Top Viewed
• Most Discussed
• Most Liked