Good advice, Nick. Is the old adage still in effect? - sm

Posted: Mar 24th, 2016 - 2:51 pm In Reply to: MT - Nick

"It's not worth the paper it's written on?" LOL, I had one company who pitched a hissy fit because I changed the contract they presented me with and told me I could not change it. Obviously, I did not take the position because I knew this game is a two-way street.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

So, tell me, when I work as an IC and the - MT (Views: 1114, 2016-03-24, 9:42 am)
- Just politely say no and remind them of your IC - status if you do not want (Views: 756, 2016-03-24, 10:01 am)
- MT - Nick (Views: 654, 2016-03-24, 11:33 am)
  - Good advice, Nick. Is the old adage still in effect? - sm
    - Sometimes it's in effect, BUT..... - Nick (Views: 559, 2016-03-24, 4:33 pm)
- Its not you, my dear - stormy (Views: 574, 2016-03-24, 2:23 pm)
  - Stormy - Caroline (Views: 631, 2016-03-24, 4:46 pm)
- Why are you on a schedule as an IC? Do you - sm (Views: 563, 2016-03-24, 2:43 pm)
  - I have a set of hours I'm available to them, - MT (Views: 572, 2016-03-24, 3:26 pm)
    - I have a set hours I'm available to them, - anon (Views: 536, 2016-03-24, 5:09 pm)
  - Putting illegal requests into a contract - Nick (Views: 579, 2016-03-24, 4:53 pm)
    - Nick, for the IC MT, would you agree that - anon (Views: 497, 2016-03-24, 5:47 pm)
      - Anon - Nick (Views: 571, 2016-03-24, 7:01 pm)
        Exactly, Nick - anon (Views: 591, 2016-03-24, 7:18 pm)
        Anon - Nick (Views: 448, 2016-03-24, 7:57 pm)
        It's not just the huge MTSOs any longer who - anon (Views: 586, 2016-03-25, 9:02 am)