A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Editors: What percentage of your time is not compensated? - Angie

Posted: Apr 29, 2013

Trying to determine the norm for providing free work. I spend more time fixing dictator's demographic errors demographic errors and searching for data that should have been dictated than I do editing. I'm just wondering if other editors just note these problems for QA to deal with or are you also working pretty much for free? Anyone been fired for refusing to work for free?

I would guestimate at least 25% - I work for free

[ In Reply To ..]
Just sayin

That sounds about right. - anon

[ In Reply To ..]
Demographics can take a lot of time when you have to search by a name that is not spelled for you.

Also when you have to load preset headings but don't get paid for them.

Templates you have to search for and insert and don't get paid for.

CC's to docs you have to search for.

On and on and on.

Yeah, 25% sounds about right, if not more.

On average 25%+. But on a badly VR'ed report, - it an be as high as 50%. :(

[ In Reply To ..]

As long as we accept - being paid

[ In Reply To ..]
by the line, we can expect a lot of our work not to be compensated, plain and simple. What is surprising is that people still accept being paid like this since our line rate had plummeted in the last few years. The only way this will change is if they just can't find anyone to do it anymore, but I really don't think this will happen if it hasn't happened by now.

so true - so my question is

[ In Reply To ..]
what would it take for each of you - MT/QA - who gripe about not being paid for all the work you do to organize to make sure it does not continue? it really seems as though you all just need a place to vent and actually are truly comfortable with not being paid for all the work you do and with falsifying your timesheets. :)

Similar Messages:

Mar 19, 2012

...

Jul 27, 2014

Doc says, "Ischemic cardiomyopathy, well compensated." Is it well compensated or well-compensated. I don't know why i am forgetting this one, but i keep going back and forth on it. ...

Jun 27, 2012

I sent in 10% to QA last month due to difficult dictators. There were a couple of days where I had some really bad dictations and maybe sent in 4 reports on that day. Other days I didn't send any reports to QA. The company has always told us if we are not 100% sure of the word to leave it blank. Now I am being penalized for taking this advice. I have been put on notice that they will let me go if I continue to go over 8%. Does this seem unreasonable? &nbs ...

Feb 27, 2013

Can anyone tell me what QC percentage means on our time card and what it has to be in order to get our weekly bonus? Thank you! ...

Feb 18, 2011

dictated one-tenth percent - would you type .1%? This seems odd to me. TIA. ...

Sep 14, 2013

AND, are you able to make money? How expensive is the insurance and how are the supervisors? Thank you. ...

Nov 30, 2014

our pay will be docked because we may leave out "a" or something along that line or not place a comma where they believe it should be. Before it just affected our bonuses but not our actual pay that we get. Now our pay will be deducted for every error that they deem that we make!!! That doesn't even seem legal. Even if you work at McDonalds and make a mistake they don't cut your pay and don't give me the crap about affecting patient safety. Bull crap! ...

Jan 21, 2015

When we first started this new compensation plan, I remember the magic line percentage for QA was 2%... but was that NO MORE than 2% gets post-audited, or AT LEAST 2% gets post-audited? Just realized I have over 200 lines already post-audited for the week, but I have only transcribed 6500 lines so far, and 2% of that would be 130. ...

Mar 06, 2015

I never know where I stand until after the fact. Do any of you know how to keep track of this? The nonsense just keeps increasing and increasing. ...

Apr 27, 2015

This past pay period because my QC percentage was over 10% both weeks I calculated lost wages of almost $400. The first week my quality was 100%, the second 99.7%. The second week my QC percent was just a hair over 10%, but I of course ended up on the bottom of the pay grid, a difference of $150 for the week. I don't send reports to QC because I'm lazy. Why should we continue to get penalized for bad dictators, unknown names/business entities on new accounts, et ...

Jun 03, 2015

Does anyone remember what they had said the percentage of audit should be each week? I know I have only had 1 job audited each week for the past 3 weeks. Which of course means 1 mistake and I'm under 99%. Anyone? Thanks. ...

Nov 24, 2010

NM ...

Jan 23, 2012

Is industry standard now a requirement of 99% accuracy for the usual employee review to maintain employment or (heaven forbid) achieve a bonus? 97%, 98%, or 99%. Just curious. ...

Nov 24, 2013

On the account I work I'd say only about one dictator in 20 can achieve 99% accuracy with VR without editing. This doesn't surprise me in the least. We could have told the developers this 20 years ago, but money talks. For the doctors forced to use VR, will the errors be acceptable to them? To the big wigs at the hospitals? ...

Aug 08, 2014

actually make sense or work. If you do lose the 0.03 cpl, don't they have to make sure you are paid min wage per hour. Wouldn't they then have to supplement you? What sense does this policy make then? ...

Oct 26, 2014

Has anyone figured out how the h____ this new trending and correction report percentage is working on Fiesa. Are they cherry picking the most difficult doctors to audit and skipping over the physicians that would balance the percentage score. That thing is so skewed, I cannot figure out for the life of me what it is suppose to reveal. It is totally biased against the MLS from what I can understand. ...

Feb 21, 2015

The day we suddenly ran out of work in early February was when another MTSO got the account. For my fellow MTs who are suffering from no work from that account, you can go to TTS, who is still hiring for it. Line rate for employees .01 cent less than TT but they pay headers, which TT did not. You can make the same (.01 cent more if you decide to be an IC rather than employee). I hope this info can help some who need the work and no longer have it. Doubt IMEDX will ever g ...

Oct 19, 2009

x ...

Jul 03, 2010

blood alcohol was 0.403 which is 3 100ths (3 hundreths) of a percentage over what they will take. Help! I am stumped! ...

Mar 18, 2010

I am confused. ...

Mar 20, 2014

NM ...

May 18, 2014

. ...

May 18, 2010

This is my yearly ode to all of you during MT WEEK, and I want to again express my humble opinion. For just a few minutes, please put aside your depression and anger at your profession and just take a deep breath and listen to what I have to say. I am truly awed by what you all do. What other profession would you have to be a medical terminology specialist, pharmacology specialist, English language expert, AND a computer/software expert all in one? There is no other pr ...

Jul 30, 2010

What is the current pay range for editors? ...

Aug 01, 2010

How much do editors of regualr transcriptionists make. Not VR. The ones that check the MT's work? ...

Oct 07, 2010

nm ...

Oct 07, 2010

Since VR, do companies still hire "editors" or QA to review/fix the reports done by MT on the VR? If so, what is salary like. Is it hourly/by line and production? How is the job itself? Any info appreciated. ...

Mar 24, 2011

Any comments on working as an editor for Ascend? I am an editor/AM now and possibly looking to change jobs soon. Thanks! ...

Apr 07, 2011

I've been an MT for many years but I am new to SR editing and I am feeling kind of incompetent. Today it took me 45 minutes to edit 1 note which was 57 lines long I've worked for 5 hours today so far and I have 500 lines. For any MTs out there who switched over to editing, how long did it take you to get up to speed with it and earning a decent hourly wage? For the experienced editors, about how many lines do you edit per hour? I do like the com ...

Jan 04, 2013

I'm back to editing after a few years away from it and can't believe how bad the software still is. The company I worked for 3 years ago used better software and the drafts were not that bad. Now I'm with a different company using not the best editing software. Not sure what the docs are using, but the VR really does a bad job, even with very good dictators. On words it doesn't understand it ignores them and then picks up when it understands it again. The errors it is makin ...