to clarify, I do not mean deductions to our pay - in general, we have all suffered those.

Posted: Mar 1st, 2016 - 1:01 pm In Reply to: I would bet most of the people who post on this board - have not had deductions in their pay. NM

the topic here is deductions for blanks or QA, etc.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Is it possible to meed all the metrics? - mom2huskies (Views: 1020, 2016-03-01, 9:35 am)
- Yes, I meet them all most of the time. - LDSMT (Views: 899, 2016-03-01, 9:47 am)
  - LDSMT, give it time . . . - anon (Views: 753, 2016-03-01, 10:02 am)
    - Been here for years, they have not yet - LDSMT (Views: 1050, 2016-03-01, 10:42 am)
      - I think most of us struggle - mom2huskies (Views: 791, 2016-03-01, 10:58 am)
  - Metrics - just me (Views: 759, 2016-03-01, 10:11 am)
    - I have never had pay deduction for blanks - LDSMT (Views: 765, 2016-03-01, 10:44 am)
      - blanks - just me (Views: 753, 2016-03-01, 10:52 am)
        It goes into effect only for lines above 5%.... - sm (Views: 661, 2016-03-01, 11:24 am)
        I know the answer - Catpuppy (Views: 936, 2016-03-01, 1:16 pm)
        Where did you hear that??? - nm (Views: 1035, 2016-03-01, 3:31 pm)
        HDSM told me herself. - Catpuppy (Views: 639, 2016-03-01, 3:54 pm)
        I check the detail of my pay every pay period - LDSMT (Views: 745, 2016-03-01, 11:30 am)
        Find that a little hard to believe . . . - MT (Views: 1151, 2016-03-01, 11:59 am)
        I do not really care what you believe. Sounds - LDSMT (Views: 693, 2016-03-01, 12:22 pm)
        And what trouble would that be? - MT (Views: 679, 2016-03-01, 12:38 pm)
        I would bet most of the people who post on this board - have not had deductions in their pay. NM (Views: 631, 2016-03-01, 12:48 pm)
        LOL - MT2 (Views: 731, 2016-03-01, 12:58 pm)
        to clarify, I do not mean deductions to our pay - in general, we have all suffered those.
        The topic was metrics in general . . . - anon (Views: 676, 2016-03-01, 1:16 pm)
        It is possible to meet their metrics. I rarely do not. - LDSMT (Views: 970, 2016-03-01, 2:17 pm)
        Wow LDSMT - OHMT (Views: 700, 2016-03-01, 2:45 pm)
        I am not a suit. Trust me. I dislike this place almost - LDSMT (Views: 760, 2016-03-01, 3:41 pm)
        LDSMT - just me (Views: 642, 2016-03-01, 4:50 pm)
        I am also on Fluency - LDSMT (Views: 661, 2016-03-01, 6:14 pm)
        I will trade accounts with you! - dnr (Views: 637, 2016-03-02, 1:11 am)
        I never had a deduction and I'm in Fluency - PA MT (Views: 612, 2016-03-02, 7:32 am)
      - do you even work for this company? wha? - moonchild (Views: 625, 2016-03-01, 4:29 pm)
    - I have never had a pay deduction either. I sent very - little to QA though. I think your (Views: 626, 2016-03-01, 3:35 pm)
- IMO, it depends on the accounts you get. - dnr (Views: 748, 2016-03-01, 11:27 am)
  - I was at MM 3 years and never had a deduction - sm (Views: 609, 2016-03-01, 3:36 pm)
    - Question off-topic - Catpuppy (Views: 630, 2016-03-01, 3:58 pm)
      - Off topic, what do you mean - Not sure what you are asking (Views: 618, 2016-03-01, 5:14 pm)
        Thank you! - Catpuppy (Views: 593, 2016-03-01, 5:50 pm)
- LDSMT is clearly a special snowflake - I never meet metrics (Views: 636, 2016-03-01, 4:57 pm)
  - LDSMT certainly is special . . . - MT2 (Views: 961, 2016-03-01, 6:18 pm)
    - she admittedly gets an absolutely perfect primary - and doesnt have to bounce around either (Views: 940, 2016-03-01, 7:15 pm)
  - I find it interesting - LDSMT (Views: 681, 2016-03-01, 10:50 pm)
    - Happy for you LDSMT - MT Headed (Views: 672, 2016-03-02, 7:33 am)
      - Agree with you MT Headed - PA MT (Views: 875, 2016-03-02, 7:38 am)
      - That is exactly how I feel. I could not have said it better. Thank you. - LDSMT (Views: 649, 2016-03-02, 7:50 am)
    - I have never had pay deduction either LDSMT. I - think if this was prevalant it would (Views: 608, 2016-03-02, 7:37 am)
    - LDSMT, I said thank you at that time - when I did not know who you were (Views: 630, 2016-03-02, 7:52 am)
      - Thanks for the support. - LDSMT (Views: 1055, 2016-03-02, 7:57 am)
        Happy for you too, LDSMT - anon (Views: 611, 2016-03-02, 8:45 am)
        If you read it as snarky, you added that tone, it was not mine. - LDSMT (Views: 547, 2016-03-02, 9:06 am)
- People who state they can meet the metrics - REALLY need to trade accounts for a while SM (Views: 508, 2016-03-02, 2:59 pm)
  - People who cannot meet the metrics really need to take that up with MM - Why blame it on others (Views: 565, 2016-03-02, 3:51 pm)
    - It's not that anyone is taking it out on . . . - anon (Views: 522, 2016-03-02, 6:48 pm)
      - Show me exactly where I said anything like that - LDSMT (Views: 561, 2016-03-02, 10:08 pm)