 |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
 |
|
 |
Nuance Today's Top Viewed: GMR.. (Views: 36)
|
 |
I don't think you understand - anonymous QC Posted: Jul 16th, 2015 - 1:28 pm In Reply to: Patient care and blanks or other - referrals to QA
First please remember there is a big difference between QC and QA, QC is who you send reports to not QA...you cannot send reports to QA at all...QA audits everyone. I am only referring to QC. I am only referring to people who leave giant explanations in the body of a report....the comment box is the only place there needs to be comments. We have to 100% every report sent to us, we no longer just fill in blanks, so we will catch any issue. I am referring to explanations attached to blanks like "could not hear" or "was unclear" or "bad audio"...we kinda know if there is a blank there that you couldn't hear it or the dictator was mumbling, etc. We don't need to know why you left a blank. And before when we were just filling in blanks, not 100%, this practice was even dangerous sometimes if a QC missed erasing these big long explantations
Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
- SUGGESTION FROM A QC - anonymous QC (Views: 1363, 2015-07-14, 12:11 pm)
- To anonymous QC - Another QC (Views: 811, 2015-07-15, 8:43 am)
- actually - anonymous QC (Views: 774, 2015-07-15, 12:57 pm)
- QC - mt2 (Views: 801, 2015-07-15, 1:42 pm)
- Yes - anonymous QC (Views: 629, 2015-07-15, 11:31 pm)
- influence - mt (Views: 634, 2015-07-20, 7:03 pm)
|
 |
|
 |
|
