Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

lab tests - mom22

Posted: Aug 12th, 2015 - 7:07 pm In Reply to: 0.25 taken off for "liver function tests" instead of LFTs. - Tired

I believe that is one I would challenge. Unless the SPECS specifically say to spell out lab terms, I believe that is completely acceptable, and I would find the page in BOS stating such. We all know the -0.25 isn't how much is taken off.

This is definitely one I would do a reversal on. Good luck!

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

0.25 taken off for "liver function tests" instead of LFTs. - Tired (Views: 670, 2015-08-10, 5:45 pm)
- The "standard" is usually to leave lab names abbreviated - nm (Views: 497, 2015-08-10, 6:30 pm)
- I think they are supposed to QA a certain number of lines per week. - Not reports. (Views: 505, 2015-08-10, 7:28 pm)
  - If it's supposed to be a certain amount of lines... - they still are not doing that (Views: 507, 2015-08-10, 7:49 pm)
- Yes - that is the ONLY way this even begins to be fair - Maybe not 5 reports.... (Views: 461, 2015-08-10, 7:47 pm)
- Some accounts view that as line padding--sm - anon (Views: 464, 2015-08-10, 10:33 pm)
- Simple... - winston (Views: 503, 2015-08-11, 7:17 am)
- lab tests - mom22
- Abbreviations - anon (Views: 665, 2015-08-20, 12:56 am)