A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
what the doc's culpability was. He hadn't read or signed the report yet. But perhaps he was contacted and told them to use his DS, even knowing he hadn't read it? (assuming he ever would have "read" it)
"The hospital violated its own procedures and multiple national patient safety standards by using the unreviewed, unsigned Discharge Summary to write admission and medication orders for Sharon Juno's admission to a local rehabilitation facility."
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jury-holds-hospital-transcription-company-responsible-for-fatal-medication-error-140-million-verdict-2012-12-17
"Still, Finbohner said, the error never should have resulted in Juno’s death because the nurse at Thomas Hospital should have used the original document prepared by the doctor – the so-called medication reconciliation form. She testified that the original form was not available because it was being scanned.
So she used the discharge summary prepared in India and wrote the medication information onto the physician admission order containing the doctor’s signature. It made it appear as if the doctor had confirmed the information about the medication when he had not, Finkbohner said."
http://blog.al.com/live/2012/12/fatal_outsourcing_thomas_hospi.html
I'd like to know what the other two "critical errors" were in the transcript (as per the "three critical errors" mentioned in the Marketwatch.com article).