No advantage. Just another smoke and mirrors - scam to make you think you

Posted: Mar 7th, 2016 - 2:20 pm In Reply to: Competency badges-can we use them to pay bills. - Negative Nelly

are the bomb. Notice how they compare it to scouting program. One problem with that, scouting promotes HONESTY. Shame on you Nuance in trying to get in on that.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Competency badges-can we use them to pay bills. - Negative Nelly (Views: 972, 2016-03-07, 1:08 pm)
- They gave me a badge. - I quit. (Views: 903, 2016-03-07, 1:29 pm)
- No advantage. Just another smoke and mirrors - scam to make you think you
- I have to imagine that the person who devises - all the Enrich garbage (Views: 896, 2016-03-07, 3:12 pm)
  - Badges? - We dont need no stinking badges (Views: 789, 2016-03-07, 4:23 pm)
    - LOL!!! - That about sums it up (Views: 563, 2016-03-07, 4:53 pm)
  - IKR, and they're VIRTUAL badges at that!! - sm (Views: 579, 2016-03-08, 8:57 am)
    - Like A Worthless Gold Star - Jellybean (Views: 539, 2016-03-09, 6:29 pm)
- Competency badge? - Is that like the (Views: 1000, 2016-03-07, 3:46 pm)
- if you're talking about the Quality Passport Credential... - HAPPYsoFar (Views: 817, 2016-03-08, 12:01 am)
  - VP, is that - you? (Views: 743, 2016-03-08, 1:05 pm)
  - Different thing. sm - Please sm. (Views: 640, 2016-03-08, 2:21 pm)
    - An interesting idea, did you find any of the - Enrich things were worth it? (Views: 580, 2016-03-08, 4:44 pm)
      - Courses. - Please sm. (Views: 588, 2016-03-08, 11:51 pm)
- Badges - ~ (Views: 798, 2016-03-08, 8:06 am)
- Badges - sickened (Views: 785, 2016-03-08, 10:54 am)
  - sickening - ~ (Views: 691, 2016-03-08, 12:12 pm)
  - I have found that - "badges = target" (Views: 625, 2016-03-08, 10:07 pm)
- competency badges - mll (Views: 592, 2016-03-09, 1:49 pm)
- I wish I had kept a copy of the email we received by mistake - Mscuedawg (Views: 595, 2016-03-13, 10:49 am)