A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Kaiser Permanente started using Dragon vr software about 4 years ago. It started with one or two doctors, then gradually spread to all +/- 35 Radiologists. I am now in "redeployment status"--Kaiser notified me late August 2009 that my job of 12 years is terminated as of August 2010. Too bad landlords doesn't speak Hospital Efficiency...anyway, the idea was to give patients 'instant access' to their diagnoses, which I understand. But I mean, at what cost (other than loss of employment lol)? Some of the docs hate it. One said Dragon was cumbersome to learn, "like driving a stick-shift". The biggest impact I've seen, though, is the corrupted reports that get signed off by fast talking MD's. To my knowledge, the Kaiser I work at has no official "editing" protocol in place--they certainly didn't ask us evaporating MT's to provide assistance in this area--and some of the reports I've stumbled across have been pretty interesting. One report I saw was comprised of random words strung together; they were spelled correctly and ~kind of~ made grammatical sense, but contextually were waaaaaaaay off. I saw the rad's name, and when I imagined her voice dictating the report, I completely understood what the sentense was supposed to say. It was hilarious! The "sounds" were correct, but the words that freakin Dragon program came up with...my goodness! Another doctor has been resisting strenuously the use of VR for diagnosing. She uses Dragon for emails and the like, but adamantly sticks to cassettes lol for her interpretations. And this one other doctor, he just dictates or self-types, period. What all of this told me is that Kaiser must have been putting some pressure on the docs to use vr; As opposed to 'ok, here's an alternative thing for you guys to use', it was more like, 'ok this is how it's going to be. Heeeere MT, MT, MT, we got a surprise for you..." and guillotine chop.
Well, I've sent out 28 transfer applications so far, heard back from only one. I would speculate that the quality of my work is perhaps to blame, except that my performance evals are always stellar, if I may toot my own horn :)