Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Top Viewed:

Your attempt to insult me is wasted. I am NOT PAID - TO ALTER WHAT IS STATED

Posted: Jan 7th, 2024 - 1:46 pm In Reply to: I get what you're saying, but as a professional transcriptionist - for over 30

during a BINDING, LEGAL PROCEEDING. If you actually did this type of work, you would know there is a way to specifically "tag" a word you may believe is misstated. Unlike what you are trying to imply, I am very professional in what I do; I follow the established guidelines for my work, and I DO NOT ATTEMPT TO ACT AS YOU DO, ATTEMPTING TO INSULT OTHERS. There is a very clear, specific way to "tag" something in a legal document to alert the attorneys and others of a possible error...if you are not aware of that process, that tells me you are not as proficient in this field as you think you are.

AT NO POINT DID I SAY I SENT OUT ANYTHING WITH MULTIPLE "SPELLING ERRORS" because I refuse to do research. That is a blatant erroneous comment made by you and that comment is nothing more that a display of your snotty attitude. Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that attorneys, plaintiffs, and defendants are not spelling each and every word, correctly or incorrectly, and that I in turn, am typing the incorrect spelling of that word. Yes, we all know how to run spell check. However, if they misspeak, it is their obligation to correct the legal document that they are presenting to a judge, and provide that judge with correct, legal, accurate information. Unauthorized alteration or changes by a scopist, court reporter, videographer, regardless of the reason, is NOT LEGAL. If you truly worked in this field, you should know that.

Clearly by your own comments, you are not making big bucks most likely because of your lack of skills than devoting so much time to correcting your "spelling errors" in a document. If you cannot quote my posts correctly, please keep your mouth shut; otherwise, you sound like the vicious, snarky MTs on this board that hate to see anyone doing better than them. I refuse to tolerate your attacks and misstatement of what I posted, or the lies you are attributing to me.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Opinions on legal transcription please, pros, cons - sm (Views: 1305, 2024-01-05, 9:40 am)
- I do extensive medicolegal depositions, - and legal depositions of all types (Views: 1205, 2024-01-05, 4:37 pm)
  - I've sent you an email. - NM (Views: 807, 2024-01-05, 5:03 pm)
    - I judst received this - I was on the phone (Views: 824, 2024-01-05, 5:12 pm)
      - Okay, send me your number or email it and I will call. - NM (Views: 901, 2024-01-05, 5:59 pm)
  - You sent an email, stating you sent the phone number 20 mins ago - but I never received anything. Pls send again NM (Views: 868, 2024-01-05, 6:32 pm)
    - Just resent it - Not sure what happened (Views: 753, 2024-01-05, 6:34 pm)
  - I'm confused on this, as I would imagine that a court reporter - would be taking (Views: 943, 2024-01-06, 10:28 am)
    - I will try to answer what I can in your post. - There are many things here, and (Views: 1042, 2024-01-06, 2:31 pm)
      - Information - can you provide (Views: 975, 2024-01-06, 3:20 pm)
        "Can you provide..." translated means give me names - so I dont have to do my own research SM (Views: 825, 2024-01-07, 11:41 am)
        Provide - Another witch (Views: 901, 2024-01-07, 12:18 pm)
        Witch - B - Knew that would happen (Views: 699, 2024-01-07, 12:20 pm)
        This is an information website for networking. The site - itself identifies (Views: 804, 2024-01-07, 12:54 pm)
        Just do a search on google - many things (Views: 691, 2024-01-07, 11:53 am)
        VIQ Solutions and Terra Nova - sm (Views: 1037, 2024-01-07, 12:13 pm)
        type in best legal transcription companies to work for - into google (Views: 854, 2024-01-07, 12:42 pm)
        I am the OP you were asking this question of - and I will help as best I can (Views: 865, 2024-01-07, 12:59 pm)
      - I'm confused - anon (Views: 824, 2024-01-06, 7:38 pm)
        Yes, big difference in editing and typing an entire transcript - sm (Views: 900, 2024-01-07, 11:45 am)
        Your assumptions and calculations regarding - pay are way off. (Views: 916, 2024-01-07, 1:19 pm)
        Good for you. The audio I get for legal is usually crap - send me an email (Views: 784, 2024-01-18, 8:02 pm)
        Of course, no reply. - sm (Views: 912, 2024-01-19, 10:45 am)
        If you are interested in making that kind of - money, why would you expect someone (Views: 811, 2024-01-19, 7:17 pm)
        Thank you. I have not been on here for several days - due to an unexpected family (Views: 716, 2024-01-19, 7:08 pm)
        Who the hell are you to demand anyone email you? - You have quite an ego (Views: 734, 2024-01-20, 12:02 pm)
        I was pretty clear in my explanation. - The court titles us as scopists (Views: 819, 2024-01-07, 1:06 pm)
        Well, hey, now I understand what you're talking - about, (Views: 667, 2024-01-07, 1:12 pm)
        Glad that cleared it up for you. It is a very lucrative - field, and I love what I do (Views: 976, 2024-01-07, 1:24 pm)
        I get what you're saying, but as a professional transcriptionist - for over 30 (Views: 813, 2024-01-07, 1:31 pm)
        Your attempt to insult me is wasted. I am NOT PAID - TO ALTER WHAT IS STATED
        Glad you slapped back on the poster attacking you. - Too many on this board (Views: 790, 2024-01-08, 2:22 pm)
        scopist - Terr (Views: 819, 2024-01-22, 9:57 am)
  - Scopist. - I too am a scopist. (Views: 1011, 2024-01-08, 2:13 am)