Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

I see she "you" will stoop to a new level to get people to come work - smh

Posted: Aug 25th, 2019 - 5:36 am In Reply to: Not True AGAIN - DOT

She changes policies every few days. I was there. I seen it happen. First there was no "audit penalties." Then there was. Then a talk about changing to a lessor penalty. The India company pays for any QA to Pennhealth at 2 cpl - start up and any failed audits. Nuance is the one doing the audits and you know how they are when it comes to errors. Any "seasoned MT" will still make errors. They will still get penalized 10$, 15$ or 20$ whichever it is now. You havent once told us what the new rate is. Why is that? There is still a chance someone can get put on 100% and that policy is still there. You can make excuses all you want, but it can happen.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Does Penn Health penalize you for sending to - QA (Views: 647, 2019-08-23, 1:07 pm)
- PennHealth QA - PennHealth Mgt (Views: 708, 2019-08-23, 1:36 pm)
  - So Why Put it in the Contract - Confusing (Views: 621, 2019-08-23, 4:04 pm)
  - That is sort of an evasive non-answer - MT2 (Views: 443, 2019-08-23, 5:46 pm)
  - Could you please clarify this? If you pend to the client, no change in rate, but if you pend - to PennHealth, you're paid less?? nm (Views: 421, 2019-08-24, 12:51 am)
    - Clarifying - DOT (Views: 631, 2019-08-24, 9:37 am)
      - What about this audit penalty that knocks you down - to 2 cpl? (Views: 629, 2019-08-24, 9:50 am)
        Audit Penalty - DOT (Views: 539, 2019-08-24, 11:41 am)
        No the audit penalty is a flat rate $20 per error - dont mislead them (Views: 385, 2019-08-24, 9:18 pm)
        Your facts are outdated and YOU are misleading them. - DOT (Views: 517, 2019-08-25, 6:23 am)
        There is still a penalty- and I stated it was decreased - read my posts- keep arguing (Views: 513, 2019-08-25, 6:48 am)
      - NOT very excellent if they penalize you for errors or blanks - Another way to screw the MT. nm (Views: 443, 2019-08-24, 9:56 am)
        Assuming the Worst - DOT (Views: 387, 2019-08-24, 11:45 am)
      - Thank you for answering. But in what cases are you allowed to pend to client - vs. allowed/required to pend to PennHealth? (Views: 456, 2019-08-24, 11:45 am)
        Sending to Client - DOT (Views: 418, 2019-08-24, 11:50 am)
        Thanks again. It doesn't look like there's much left over to have to pend to PennHealth? - nm (Views: 600, 2019-08-24, 2:44 pm)
        Exactly - DOT (Views: 385, 2019-08-24, 2:53 pm)
        You say you manager looks out for you but - sm (Views: 468, 2019-08-24, 9:48 pm)
        "which they do require that at the start when you are on 100%" - Ah, right, thanks!! sm (Views: 466, 2019-08-24, 10:31 pm)
        That is not true - DOT (Views: 523, 2019-08-25, 5:19 am)
        No read the post above- if you send to pennhealth QA - IT IS 2 CPL (Views: 500, 2019-08-25, 5:25 am)
        Manager - DOT (Views: 527, 2019-08-25, 5:15 am)
        Like what? When I was there she did nothing but empty promises - lol (Views: 534, 2019-08-25, 5:22 am)
        Please get your facts straight - DOT (Views: 428, 2019-08-25, 5:32 am)
        Please tell me what has changed then! I am still waiting to hear! - still has an audit penalty and still 2 cpl for QA (Views: 393, 2019-08-25, 5:38 am)
        PennHealth - PH Manager (Views: 599, 2019-08-25, 2:42 pm)
        Thanks, but could you specify what kinds of things *do* have to be pended to PennHealth only? - sm (Views: 420, 2019-08-24, 10:24 pm)
        I hope this explains it better - see message (Views: 412, 2019-08-25, 5:13 am)
        Oh also - If you fail an audit with Nuance they will - put you back on 100% QA- thus 2 cpl (Views: 480, 2019-08-25, 5:23 am)
        Not True AGAIN - DOT (Views: 486, 2019-08-25, 5:27 am)
        I see she "you" will stoop to a new level to get people to come work - smh
        Pend to QA - DOT (Views: 405, 2019-08-25, 5:24 am)
        Thanks. I guess it's all moot, though, because halving pay for any reason is totally - unacceptable to me. (Views: 463, 2019-08-25, 6:37 am)
        They tell you this then if too much gets sent to their QA - they have you send it to PH QA (Views: 655, 2019-08-24, 9:17 pm)
        I would not by any stretch of the imagination call it good - at 2cpl and $$ penalty. SM (Views: 564, 2019-08-24, 9:42 pm)
- Dont forget the error penalty they smack on you! - nm (Views: 435, 2019-08-23, 8:21 pm)
- They also have a penalty if you dont produce - a certain # of lines (Views: 379, 2019-08-25, 7:11 am)