Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Please get your facts straight - DOT

Posted: Aug 25th, 2019 - 5:32 am In Reply to: Like what? When I was there she did nothing but empty promises - lol

While you may have worked at PennHealth previously, you have not worked here for a while and many things have changed here. The accounts manager works and fights for the MLS. I have no doubt. She is getting policies changed for the better. You are making people have doubts because of the items you are pointing out that are not even in place anymore. The things you are pointing out are not untrue, but they are OLD AND CHANGED. So they are irrelevant. So you are providing the wrong information to those on this forum.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Does Penn Health penalize you for sending to - QA (Views: 655, 2019-08-23, 1:07 pm)
- PennHealth QA - PennHealth Mgt (Views: 714, 2019-08-23, 1:36 pm)
  - So Why Put it in the Contract - Confusing (Views: 628, 2019-08-23, 4:04 pm)
  - That is sort of an evasive non-answer - MT2 (Views: 455, 2019-08-23, 5:46 pm)
  - Could you please clarify this? If you pend to the client, no change in rate, but if you pend - to PennHealth, you're paid less?? nm (Views: 431, 2019-08-24, 12:51 am)
    - Clarifying - DOT (Views: 641, 2019-08-24, 9:37 am)
      - What about this audit penalty that knocks you down - to 2 cpl? (Views: 637, 2019-08-24, 9:50 am)
        Audit Penalty - DOT (Views: 549, 2019-08-24, 11:41 am)
        No the audit penalty is a flat rate $20 per error - dont mislead them (Views: 394, 2019-08-24, 9:18 pm)
        Your facts are outdated and YOU are misleading them. - DOT (Views: 527, 2019-08-25, 6:23 am)
        There is still a penalty- and I stated it was decreased - read my posts- keep arguing (Views: 520, 2019-08-25, 6:48 am)
      - NOT very excellent if they penalize you for errors or blanks - Another way to screw the MT. nm (Views: 450, 2019-08-24, 9:56 am)
        Assuming the Worst - DOT (Views: 394, 2019-08-24, 11:45 am)
      - Thank you for answering. But in what cases are you allowed to pend to client - vs. allowed/required to pend to PennHealth? (Views: 464, 2019-08-24, 11:45 am)
        Sending to Client - DOT (Views: 430, 2019-08-24, 11:50 am)
        Thanks again. It doesn't look like there's much left over to have to pend to PennHealth? - nm (Views: 610, 2019-08-24, 2:44 pm)
        Exactly - DOT (Views: 398, 2019-08-24, 2:53 pm)
        You say you manager looks out for you but - sm (Views: 479, 2019-08-24, 9:48 pm)
        "which they do require that at the start when you are on 100%" - Ah, right, thanks!! sm (Views: 478, 2019-08-24, 10:31 pm)
        That is not true - DOT (Views: 531, 2019-08-25, 5:19 am)
        No read the post above- if you send to pennhealth QA - IT IS 2 CPL (Views: 510, 2019-08-25, 5:25 am)
        Manager - DOT (Views: 535, 2019-08-25, 5:15 am)
        Like what? When I was there she did nothing but empty promises - lol (Views: 548, 2019-08-25, 5:22 am)
        Please get your facts straight - DOT
        Please tell me what has changed then! I am still waiting to hear! - still has an audit penalty and still 2 cpl for QA (Views: 403, 2019-08-25, 5:38 am)
        PennHealth - PH Manager (Views: 609, 2019-08-25, 2:42 pm)
        Thanks, but could you specify what kinds of things *do* have to be pended to PennHealth only? - sm (Views: 427, 2019-08-24, 10:24 pm)
        I hope this explains it better - see message (Views: 428, 2019-08-25, 5:13 am)
        Oh also - If you fail an audit with Nuance they will - put you back on 100% QA- thus 2 cpl (Views: 490, 2019-08-25, 5:23 am)
        Not True AGAIN - DOT (Views: 498, 2019-08-25, 5:27 am)
        I see she "you" will stoop to a new level to get people to come work - smh (Views: 425, 2019-08-25, 5:36 am)
        Pend to QA - DOT (Views: 413, 2019-08-25, 5:24 am)
        Thanks. I guess it's all moot, though, because halving pay for any reason is totally - unacceptable to me. (Views: 475, 2019-08-25, 6:37 am)
        They tell you this then if too much gets sent to their QA - they have you send it to PH QA (Views: 668, 2019-08-24, 9:17 pm)
        I would not by any stretch of the imagination call it good - at 2cpl and $$ penalty. SM (Views: 575, 2019-08-24, 9:42 pm)
- Dont forget the error penalty they smack on you! - nm (Views: 445, 2019-08-23, 8:21 pm)
- They also have a penalty if you dont produce - a certain # of lines (Views: 387, 2019-08-25, 7:11 am)