Assuming the Worst - DOT

Posted: Aug 24th, 2019 - 11:45 am In Reply to: NOT very excellent if they penalize you for errors or blanks - Another way to screw the MT. nm

I know it is very easy to assume the worst. Many MLS, including myself, have lost work to Nuance, etc. However, there are good, solid companies to grow with and make the most you can make. I am a single person who raised 2 kids working from home. I have had struggles for years.
With PennHealth, I have made more money than I have made elsewhere. I put the work in and they pay me fairly. We just started a new HUGE account. I have so much work available to me that I will be able to work when I want and work as much as I want. I make my own paycheck and I am very happy here.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Does Penn Health penalize you for sending to - QA (Views: 619, 2019-08-23, 1:07 pm)
- PennHealth QA - PennHealth Mgt (Views: 683, 2019-08-23, 1:36 pm)
  - So Why Put it in the Contract - Confusing (Views: 565, 2019-08-23, 4:04 pm)
  - That is sort of an evasive non-answer - MT2 (Views: 419, 2019-08-23, 5:46 pm)
  - Could you please clarify this? If you pend to the client, no change in rate, but if you pend - to PennHealth, you're paid less?? nm (Views: 396, 2019-08-24, 12:51 am)
    - Clarifying - DOT (Views: 604, 2019-08-24, 9:37 am)
      - What about this audit penalty that knocks you down - to 2 cpl? (Views: 588, 2019-08-24, 9:50 am)
        Audit Penalty - DOT (Views: 488, 2019-08-24, 11:41 am)
        No the audit penalty is a flat rate $20 per error - dont mislead them (Views: 365, 2019-08-24, 9:18 pm)
        Your facts are outdated and YOU are misleading them. - DOT (Views: 495, 2019-08-25, 6:23 am)
        There is still a penalty- and I stated it was decreased - read my posts- keep arguing (Views: 484, 2019-08-25, 6:48 am)
      - NOT very excellent if they penalize you for errors or blanks - Another way to screw the MT. nm (Views: 405, 2019-08-24, 9:56 am)
        Assuming the Worst - DOT
      - Thank you for answering. But in what cases are you allowed to pend to client - vs. allowed/required to pend to PennHealth? (Views: 431, 2019-08-24, 11:45 am)
        Sending to Client - DOT (Views: 368, 2019-08-24, 11:50 am)
        Thanks again. It doesn't look like there's much left over to have to pend to PennHealth? - nm (Views: 568, 2019-08-24, 2:44 pm)
        Exactly - DOT (Views: 324, 2019-08-24, 2:53 pm)
        You say you manager looks out for you but - sm (Views: 414, 2019-08-24, 9:48 pm)
        "which they do require that at the start when you are on 100%" - Ah, right, thanks!! sm (Views: 406, 2019-08-24, 10:31 pm)
        That is not true - DOT (Views: 499, 2019-08-25, 5:19 am)
        No read the post above- if you send to pennhealth QA - IT IS 2 CPL (Views: 469, 2019-08-25, 5:25 am)
        Manager - DOT (Views: 497, 2019-08-25, 5:15 am)
        Like what? When I was there she did nothing but empty promises - lol (Views: 493, 2019-08-25, 5:22 am)
        Please get your facts straight - DOT (Views: 393, 2019-08-25, 5:32 am)
        Please tell me what has changed then! I am still waiting to hear! - still has an audit penalty and still 2 cpl for QA (Views: 360, 2019-08-25, 5:38 am)
        PennHealth - PH Manager (Views: 564, 2019-08-25, 2:42 pm)
        Thanks, but could you specify what kinds of things *do* have to be pended to PennHealth only? - sm (Views: 399, 2019-08-24, 10:24 pm)
        I hope this explains it better - see message (Views: 379, 2019-08-25, 5:13 am)
        Oh also - If you fail an audit with Nuance they will - put you back on 100% QA- thus 2 cpl (Views: 451, 2019-08-25, 5:23 am)
        Not True AGAIN - DOT (Views: 460, 2019-08-25, 5:27 am)
        I see she "you" will stoop to a new level to get people to come work - smh (Views: 382, 2019-08-25, 5:36 am)
        Pend to QA - DOT (Views: 371, 2019-08-25, 5:24 am)
        Thanks. I guess it's all moot, though, because halving pay for any reason is totally - unacceptable to me. (Views: 435, 2019-08-25, 6:37 am)
        They tell you this then if too much gets sent to their QA - they have you send it to PH QA (Views: 616, 2019-08-24, 9:17 pm)
        I would not by any stretch of the imagination call it good - at 2cpl and $$ penalty. SM (Views: 543, 2019-08-24, 9:42 pm)
- Dont forget the error penalty they smack on you! - nm (Views: 410, 2019-08-23, 8:21 pm)
- They also have a penalty if you dont produce - a certain # of lines (Views: 344, 2019-08-25, 7:11 am)