I don't think anyone is disagreeing that leaving that word - out was an error . I think Posted: Mar 26th, 2016 - 2:30 pm In Reply to: Word omission - QA person
the problem/complaint is that EVERYONE makes typos. Yes, it should be pointed out to the MT. However, the fact that QA caught it means IT CAN BE CORRECTED IN THE REPORT. So how is it fair to then penalize financially the MT?
Nuance NEEDS the MTs to make these kinds of errors so pay can be docked. Plain and simple.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
- My Nuance experience . . .. - MT Lifer (Views: 1576, 2016-03-25, 1:43 pm)
- Word omission - QA person (Views: 1090, 2016-03-26, 9:27 am)
- To QA....You should proofread your OWN work. - Read your message. (Views: 1136, 2016-03-26, 9:39 am)
- QA error - nn (Views: 885, 2016-03-26, 10:44 am)
- Spelling police - QA person (Views: 896, 2016-03-26, 12:52 pm)
- QA person - Charming (Views: 882, 2016-03-26, 1:54 pm)
- QA person - Anon (Views: 766, 2016-03-27, 11:45 am)
- I don't think anyone is disagreeing that leaving that word - out was an error . I think
|
