A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
...because so many people are not making 99.5% accuracy in their audits. Perhaps it is time to consider that whoever promised the client 99.5% accuracy has something quite strong in their medicine cabinet. For years, the standard has been 98% and that is for a reason. That number is possible with humans. Machines sure can't deliver 99.5%; just ask anyone who has to correct the harebrained interpretations of SR, which never learns, by the way. Do the doctors have to be 95.5% accurate? Sorry, just thought I would inject a big fat truckload of humor into this post.