I Am Just Sayin' - see msg

Posted: Mar 22nd, 2016 - 4:18 pm In Reply to: MT accuracy is - 99.6%

You must not have read my note accurately. I stated that I had left MT/QA. At the time I left QA/MT completely, the requirement was 98%, maybe 98.6. We all know that's changed over the years--you know, so the MTSO can pay you less per line when you have the smallest of boo-boos.

So, if QA has it so good whey don't you do it?

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

QA compensation - Robin (Views: 1019, 2016-03-21, 11:37 am)
- QA pay - easterrabbit (Views: 731, 2016-03-21, 12:36 pm)
- My Story - see msg (Views: 873, 2016-03-21, 5:09 pm)
  - MTs are "little queenies"?? - Pfffft (Views: 730, 2016-03-21, 5:13 pm)
    - It truly does happen both ways. - older CMT (Views: 670, 2016-03-21, 10:20 pm)
      - QA pay - Robin (Views: 696, 2016-03-22, 7:08 am)
        MT accuracy is - 99.6% (Views: 605, 2016-03-22, 7:29 am)
        I Am Just Sayin' - see msg
        Former QA - see msg (Views: 533, 2016-03-22, 4:30 pm)
    - Some MTs Do Not Understand - If they have not done QA (Views: 589, 2016-03-22, 4:13 pm)
  - What do you mean, "little queenies?" - Dismayed. (Views: 645, 2016-03-22, 4:46 pm)
    - Isn't this nice? It's what the MTSOs want - QA - and MT butting heads so that (Views: 546, 2016-03-23, 11:19 am)
      - I Agree - see msg (Views: 538, 2016-03-23, 4:09 pm)
    - What We Mean - see msg (Views: 693, 2016-03-23, 11:43 am)
- I get paid production - Just Me (Views: 529, 2016-03-24, 9:45 pm)
  - you get paid production? - Robin (Views: 462, 2016-03-25, 6:36 am)