This is not a HIPAA violation. - sm

Posted: Oct 20th, 2015 - 7:48 pm In Reply to: what company - sm

HIPAA addresses inappropriate disclosures, not what MT did the work or how the company identifies them. There is no requirement for the MT to "sign" the work, nor does the name or number they use

Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Forgery on Medical Documentation - Victim MT (Views: 964, 2015-10-20, 7:50 am)
- what company - sm (Views: 740, 2015-10-20, 8:34 am)
  - this was - posted previously (Views: 691, 2015-10-20, 10:27 am)
    - Not the past - Victim mt (Views: 595, 2015-10-20, 2:46 pm)
  - This is not a HIPAA violation. - sm
    - This is not correct - Victim MT (Views: 622, 2015-10-20, 8:43 pm)
      - While - You (Views: 621, 2015-10-21, 7:56 am)
      - That is just nonsense. - sm (Views: 514, 2015-10-21, 8:07 pm)
  - Nope, it is not Modal - Victim MT (Views: 664, 2015-10-20, 8:39 pm)
- Ilegal - MT2 (Views: 662, 2015-10-20, 10:57 am)
  - It's at least a violation of contract law - been there (Views: 643, 2015-10-20, 11:29 am)
  - Oh, no ... wrong, wrong, wrong! - LOL (Views: 552, 2015-10-20, 7:43 pm)
- Their clients should know. (nm) - Linda (Views: 545, 2015-10-20, 1:36 pm)
  - Absolutely, they should know! - Victim MT (Views: 531, 2015-10-20, 8:47 pm)

This is not a HIPAA violation. - sm

Post A Reply

Reply By Email