A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
So I check Feisa and there is a "C" graded report.....I'm fed up. What do you put for feedback? Here is what I sent:
" Well, I give up. There is not a human being alive who can be 100% for 100% of the time or even 98% for 100% of the time. I don't make errors on purpose. This job is too tedious and detail oriented to stare at the computer screen for 8 hours a day and not make some mistakes. I am not a machine. I shall continue to do my work to the best of my human ability which is never going to be 100% for 100% of the time. This system of scoring is humanly unreasonable, and insulting and does not promote incentive to do better, but quite the opposite, promotes an "I don't care" attitude....Thanks for the feedback. Have a nice day."
...no one is monitoring the QA's work and they are not aware that this QA is nit picking your work to death.
I was a QA/trainer for years and I never had these problems with the MTs I worked with, became friends with and am still friends with today. I would add or remove commas and other punctuation (or very minor things of that nature that made no consequence to anyone), but I never counted those changes against the MT. I never even informed the MT that I had made such insignificant changes, unless it changed or skewed the intended meaning of the sentence. There is so much gray area between one person's preferences for a comma and another person's preference to omit a comma, etc., and it served no purpose to nit pick and haggle over such small errors. I was never out to defeat the MTs but rather to help them become better. I also wasn't hired as a grammar teacher (although that was my major in college, lol)... I was hired to make sure the MTs weren't going to inadvertently kill a patient.
I know it's frustrating and I've been where you are. I had to pay my dues as an MT first for years too. You have one QA who always puts a comma before the word "which" (even though it's not always correct to do so) and counts you off for it... and then you have another QA who couldn't care less about the stupid minute punctuation and only focuses on the real content of the report.
If the QA in question at your job is not practicing these guidelines and she is instead finding the smallest inconsequential errors to count off your reports, report her azz. This job should NEVER be about a missing pronoun that doesn't affect the patient's care in any way... it should NEVER be about someone accidentally hitting the semicolon key instead of the colon key... it should be about making sure the person lying in a hospital bed isn't being given the wrong medication or the wrong diagnosis.
Tell your supervisor I said so !! :)
When I said, "I've been where you are," I didn't mean to come off sounding like some all-knowing, more experienced snob. I just meant I've had this same problem when I was on the MT side of things. I am no longer a QA, by the way. I recently quit my QA job and went back to MT mode for another company after dealing with too many psychotic, micromanaging CEOs for way too long - and also because I had to deal with a supervisor just like the QA you are describing, who found every little reason to count off on our monthly random audits. I just meant that as an MT being overly criticized by QA, I've had to deal with that too.
I hope things get better or that perhaps you can find a job where you are treated better.
peace :)