Because . . . - anon

Do you not even understand the job of a QA? I'll never know why they - sm

You make no sense. I have 20 yr exp. What does qa with no - exp have to do with not paying for additions? nm

You can get paid - MT

Not talking about corrections outside of blanks. Talking - those reports with 10 blanks SM

Because that is the job of a QA. That's how it works, everywhere. - It averages out with the easy ones. nm

Again, what are you talking about. I qa for another MTSO and I - get paid based on the report SM

I've always been paid QAing by the original line count, regardless of - what I do to the report. NM

Sure, by companies like MM. DOesnt make it right just because you - are okay with it. And you being okay SM

For example.. - In this MTSO

That's not what we are talking about. - sm

That's part of being a QA. I'm surprised they adjusted the line count. - nm

Obviously, you haven't had it happen to you for 2 hours straight - sm

Maybe you fill them in because it's your job duty - sm

Exactly! If they are that unhappy, send that QA work my way. I rarely - get any these days! nm

Do you want to be paid based on the job another MT submitted? - No, you want paid on the job YOU did. nm

So you'd be happy with be paid for just the work you did - sm

I have been told even a blanks only job should be quickly looked - over. If there is a critical error on ANY qa

Why don't you say MMEs should be paid hourly - and stop stirring the pot. nm

Funny you say that. I DO think qa should be paid hourly. - No stirring here, just facts. nm

When we were QASs, we were paid hourly, as it should be. - sm

And there were way fewer of these horrible auditors back then.... - nm

According to your logic, MTs should not be paid for lines in a template. - That okay with you? nm

As an MT, if you were checking your lines and discovered you - were not being paid for every SM