A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
I'm not talking about the official proofreader positions that people hire in as. I'm talking about VR "editing" - meaning, when you get those reports where VR does what it's supposed to, and you only need to add 1 comma, for instance, in the entire report - and you are zipping along at the 300-400 lph you were promised, as justification for the 50% pay cut on switch to VR...isn't that actually proofreading??
...but what about those OTHER reports...the ones that require a little (or a lot) of "TLC" - babysitting, handholding, call it what you will...then those you really trully are editing...that you have to make changes in every sentence, if not more...whole phrases drop out...or are added in erroneously...etc...
Why does the distinction matter...because proofing and editing imply two different levels of effort...and so there should be 2 (or multiple) pay rates for VR, because you're not actually doing the same work, not by a long shot, on all reports.
I just wonder what the legalities are, when an employer mischaracterizes (let me rephrase that, misrepresents) what a job entails...in order to pay a worker less. How can that be legal? I wonder also if the Fair Pay Act applies, because MT-ing in US is female-dominated, as they say - whereas editing and proofing fields...aren't???? Have to check on that.
Opinions please...are you a VR/SR editor AND proofreader both? I think I am - and I want to be paid accordingly.