A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
as of 07/24 we all started on our "new" pay scales. I started work this morning, first thing I checked was my stats and I have THREE critical errors and the dreaded e-mailing that I failed audit...
my first ding is on a verbatim report: X-Fix corrected to ex-fix. Now, I know that there is the Biomet X-fix device and that ex-fix is short for external fixator, but since at the beginning the doc refers to Biomet, I chose X-fix. This should not be incorrect or critical error!
Second, on a verbatim report following client profile doc dictates cc, I get dinged and it gets corrected to ml. I read and re-read the client profile. Again, I am not wrong.
Again, on a verbatim report with client profile in bold at the top saying "TRANSCRIBE HEADINGS AS DICTATED FROM PREFERRED HEADINGS" I selected ASSISTANT SURGEON, which was dinged and changed to ASSISTANT. I attended the workshop on this facility and we were TOLD to select the "most appropriate heading" from the preferred headings, to get it as close to what the dictator says as possible! How in the world could I then be wrong???
I am now down to working for pennies and am feeling desperate since this pay period is the one I use to pay rent... I want to argue these!!! Has anyone successfully argued their way off of 100% QA after an audit? I am NOT wrong here! I've spent most of the morning reading, re-reading client profiles, listening and re-listening to my reports and if I had it to do over again, I know I'd do the same!