A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
On the newbie page is yet another thread with nothing but mindless- "don't waste your money/time" posts from supposedly experienced MTs.
Like it or not, MT isn't disappearing. Neither is AHDI. Like it or not, credentialing is going to be a fact of life if you're an MT. I'm no big fan of AHDI either, but I have paid enough attention to what's going on in the industry to know what the wind is bringing in.
The MTs who do little more than bash and dash, who offer nothing but "chicken little" advice are doing a great disservice to those who come and read these pages. For better or worse, AHDI is the ONLY game in town for MTs. They *WILL* be the credentialing body when credentialing becomes mandatory (and this is going to happen sooner rather than later). Credentialing should have been made mandatory years ago but the "babes in Modesto" were pretty busy getting rich and making names for themselves rather than working for the MT. AHDI is what it is and given that, you get to choose if you will be a PROFESSIONAL MT or you will be an MT who does little more than bad-mouth the profession.
I encourage anyone (new or not) to look into getting your credential. It is finally going to mean enough to begin putting MTs on equal footing with other professions who've had credentialing in place for decades. It's going to be a statement to an employer that says you can at least do ground-floor level of work. I just wonder how many bad-mouthing the credential and the profession are ones who are unable to stay competitive. Either way, it's about time we take the route of encouraging each other instead of seeing who can insult the loudest, right?
Playing Devil’s Advocate here, what makes you think “transcriptionists” will be in the majority 10 years from now?
Pushing for mandatory Certification does not happen overnight, and I believe AHDI started this push long before they realized exactly to what extend Speech Recognition (and even off-shoring) would impact the Medical Transcription profession.
There are very few job posts with companies offering strictly straight transcription, but there are plenty of complaints regarding Speech Recognition and the lack of straight transcription jobs. Between large MTSOs being hell-bent on acquiring smaller companies and small practices and clinics requesting lower cents per line charges from their current ICs, it is getting harder and harder to find companies who do only straight transcription. The smaller, one or two-person true Independent Contractors cannot (or do not want to) add more staff. So, in my opinion, it appears that in a few years, the majority of people in the Medical Transcription field will be actually SR Editors and not Medical Transcriptionists, in the strictest sense of the word.
As soon as AHDI realizes that, they will start pushing for an SR Editor Certification (Certified Speech Recognition Editor or CSRE maybe ??) and the CMT (Certified Medical Transcriptionist) title will be about as useful as calling oneself a “Typist.”
Yes, they are and will be forever typewriters, but when was the last time you ran across someone who proudly stated their occupation as that of a Typist?
Hopefully, anyone with a CMT will automatically grandfather into an SR Editor Certification (whatever they decide to call it), but with how greedy all these people are, I would not be surprised if AHDI required even current CMTs to retake the “new” test.
I was one of the first MTs to sit for and pass the CMT exam in 1982. From what I have read about the current exam, very little is about actual editing. It still is geared towards straight transcription. But, I could be wrong since I have not taken the current exam.
I truly do not believe CMT will be the initials following the majority of names in the years ahead, so I do not think paying for a CMT today is worthwhile.
JUST MY OPINION, of course.
Are you aware of this:
“As of Jan. 1, 2011, the RMT credential will become a prerequisite for any candidate seeking access to the CMT exam. CMT candidates can opt to take the RMT exam first and come back for the CMT, or they can opt for the new combined CQE exam and demonstrate both Level 1 and Level 2 competency in the same exam session. CQE candidates who meet the Level 1 cut scores will automatically move on to Level 2 content. If unable to meet the cut scores for Level 2 content, the candidate will leave the exam session with an RMT credential. Candidates capable of meeting cut scores at both levels will earn the CMT credential.”
And, of course, the price of the exam has gone up, “since you are now taking 2 exams.” Need I say more about the greed of AHDI?
Good luck in whatever you decide. Go with what you feel is best for you; definitely not what anyone else tells you to do.