A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
In a state where there is a prevailing wage (over $19/hr for MTs) law for employees who perform work on a state government contract, how do you suppose this MTSO is in compliance when the MTSO itself is only getting less than 10 cents per line?
Of course, they are probably not in compliance. I suspect that, while the company address listed on the contract is within the state, the work is being performed offshore, perhaps in India (just a guess after seeing the contractor's name).
Also, I see that services performed under the contract or performed under any subcontract awarded under the contract must be performed in the United States unless it is determined by the state that the service cannot be provided by a contractor or subcontractor within the US. This is according to the law of this particular state.
I just cannot imagine that, at their price of less than 10 cents per line, the MTSO is paying their MTs (in the US or otherwise) at least the prevailing wage. I guess the Freedom of Information Act would allow me to see the actual contract and all its terms. But even if the contract states that the workers are here in the US and are getting the prevailing wage, could just anyone raise the question that it is implausible and maybe prompt an investigation? I don't have any experience with this, but I'm tired of sitting here and doing nothing about what is going on in this industry. This is just one MTSO and one (state government) contract, but maybe I can make a small difference.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to go about this? I appreciate any advice you could offer.