No, making under min. wage does...SM - Old Anon

Posted: Apr 24th, 2017 - 12:04 pm In Reply to: SM - anonymous

could cause you to be let go, because the employer has to make up the difference between your production and minimum wage. In other words, you are costing them money. You'd eventually be let go for failure to meet production standards. Most MTSOs I have worked for have given me 2 or 3 pay periods to get up to speed before the warnings to up production would start and I have always gotten there.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Forced to produce over minimum wage - Equal Opportunity Employer? (Views: 986, 2017-04-24, 1:06 am)
- Has anyone reported this to labor department? - I agree (Views: 544, 2017-04-24, 6:50 am)
- Line count average is usually...SM - Old Anon (Views: 734, 2017-04-24, 7:32 am)
  - Depends on Platform - Whether or not (Views: 491, 2017-04-24, 8:02 pm)
- SM - anonymous (Views: 573, 2017-04-24, 8:28 am)
  - No, making under min. wage does...SM - Old Anon
- The majority of companies require this and usually - will add makeup pay for 1 or 2 (Views: 486, 2017-04-24, 8:51 am)
  - Production requirements differ by states minimum wage - Ex MT (Views: 603, 2017-04-24, 11:30 pm)
    - Differing minimum line counts - Ex MT (Views: 549, 2017-04-25, 2:49 am)
      - No they don't pay more per line - for California MTs (Views: 440, 2017-04-25, 11:36 am)
        Line rate for California - Ex MT (Views: 491, 2017-04-25, 11:56 am)
        Age discrimination, gender discrimination, state discrimination - sm (Views: 492, 2017-04-25, 2:47 pm)
        With his current record, all he will do is muck it up - even worse. nm (Views: 504, 2017-04-25, 5:04 pm)
- Anyone who would agree to work for a company doing that is - desperate. Go get a real job. sm (Views: 521, 2017-04-25, 7:55 am)