No, it's 0.326 as an employee now, no longer IC. - nm

Posted: Nov 18th, 2016 - 8:16 am In Reply to: 3 cpl as an IC?!?! Aren't they the ones who stalk your - keyboard time as well? Awful. nm

I have to see how long I can afford this; not really wanting to change jobs again. Wonder what they'll be hiring employee status people at now. Oh well, it could be worse, they could have just said adios with no option to work as an employee.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

TTS - wonder how many ICs stuck around to work for - sm (Views: 777, 2016-11-18, 6:30 am)
- 3 cpl as an IC?!?! Aren't they the ones who stalk your - keyboard time as well? Awful. nm (Views: 673, 2016-11-18, 7:31 am)
  - Just quit there - Sick (Views: 828, 2016-11-18, 7:54 am)
  - TTS - Yes (Views: 778, 2016-11-18, 8:04 am)
    - sorry to hear its so bad, I was thinking of - applying to get away from (Views: 709, 2016-11-18, 1:06 pm)
  - No, it's 0.326 as an employee now, no longer IC. - nm
- What losers. I am SO VERY HAPPY that I didnt follow up - to get in there. nm (Views: 710, 2016-11-18, 8:11 am)
  - Could not have said it better myself. - CTMT (Views: 622, 2016-11-18, 11:55 am)
    - TTS - xTTS MT (Views: 904, 2016-11-18, 12:54 pm)
      - Wow, dodged a bullet then for sure. - CTMT (Views: 759, 2016-11-18, 1:07 pm)
- Belly Up - Intelligence (Views: 782, 2016-11-18, 2:13 pm)
- Not me - Outta here (Views: 645, 2016-11-18, 7:48 pm)
- I stuck - for the moment. But they're getting exactly - what they pay for and nothing more. (Views: 649, 2016-11-20, 3:21 am)
- I think they're spiffing up their Income Statement in - preparation for selling out. (Views: 573, 2016-11-20, 6:24 pm)
  - Agree. Already do overflow work from N, I think they are getting ends - together in order for N to buy them out. nm (Views: 460, 2016-11-21, 2:28 pm)
    - How far can all these buyouts of - sm (Views: 516, 2016-11-22, 7:34 am)