A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
I agree with that wholeheartedly. But unions CAN force fair compensation for the skill and experience with the new technology. I have never understood the concept that MTs should be paid half of what they normally get paid for straight typing when doing VR editing.
When doctors learned how to use da Vinci, endoscopic procedures, etc., did they get paid less because their new equipment helped them to be more proficient. Do doctors get paid less for EMR because a lot of times they don't have to dictate anymore in ER or radiology records? Why does the MT have to suffer with half the normal salary for new equipment that WE didn't even request.
It is so blatantly obvious that the new VR platforms like DocQscribe, M-Modal, BeyondTxt, and others have the capability to set their voice recognition to reject reports at a certain correction percentage. If they want to pay us half for VR, then the correction percentage should be VERY high so that we don't have to correct a lot in the report. They set these things at 75% or 80% so that we have to correct a great deal of the report and it takes almost as much time, if not more. They could set it lower, but they don't because then it gets kicked to transcription mode and they have to pay more. They leave the garbage to us while trying to sell us the "you can make double!!" spiel.
Or they could weight the VR lines also. If we do have to correct more, give us more than half in the report. If we only have to make 1 or do corrections, leave it as it is.
They do NONE of this, and a union could correct this. Unfortunately, I see very few people who want to band together to force changes. Sad.
Think of what could be accomplished if MTs would band together, quit spending so much time attacking each other's opinions on these boards, and seriously discuss and consider pros and cons of an MT union ... I don't know much about unions but would love to learn more and hear other MT opinions.