Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Top Viewed:

What a joke. - MT2

Posted: Jan 7th, 2020 - 12:58 am In Reply to: Pennhealth Mgr - PennHealth Mgt

"Here is the bottom line, do we "penalize" as you call it for sending work to QA. No we do not. It does have a different line rate yes..."

See everyone? Pennhealth don't "penalize" you for sending work to QA. They just pay you less. It's so totally not the same thing, and you're a big dum-dum if you think it is.

And your reasoning that paying transcriptionists less for using QA is okay because, "Hey! Our transcriptionists can send blanks back to our client if they want! We'll only lower our transcriptionists' pay if they care enough to get the blanks filled in on a report so that our client gets the best report possible." Well isn't that just great, bragging about your low standards. Hurray for you. Way to take the transcribing industry's reputation down another notch in order to save a few pennies, Pennhealth. Aren't you just so wonderful? You force your clients to deal with the things YOU are supposed to be handling... or you force your transcriptionists to pay for the things YOU are supposed to be handling. Either way, YOU are just worming your way out of doing your job like YOU are supposed to.

And you boast about how you allow cherry picking? Gee. What a bonus. So what? So your transcriptionists do the great work first and the crap work second, instead of mixing it all up? That's supposed to be a perk or something? Or are you saying that you don't mind if some of your transcriptionists take all the good work and leave total crap for other transcriptionists? It's one of those two reasons. I'm curious to know which one you are thinking of.

Jeez. No wonder MTStars keeps deleting your help wanted ads. How many of your ads have they deleted in the past few days? Four or five?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

How is Pennhealth to work for? - curious (Views: 796, 2020-01-06, 2:29 am)
- All I know is they deduct from your pay for errors. - MT2 (Views: 698, 2020-01-06, 3:20 am)
  - Good company - PH-MT (Views: 737, 2020-01-06, 8:53 am)
    - I figured they have - a new account. (Views: 579, 2020-01-06, 11:41 am)
    - Such a great company who steals money from the MTs for - errors, but I bet their emails and memos SM (Views: 519, 2020-01-06, 11:54 am)
      - Why such negativity? - PH-MT (Views: 593, 2020-01-06, 12:12 pm)
        We are here to - look out for each other. (Views: 618, 2020-01-06, 12:35 pm)
        You sound like the girl who used to boldly put her - name on all her posts...the (Views: 616, 2020-01-06, 1:58 pm)
        That's her, here in this linked post from past discussions - sm (Views: 522, 2020-01-06, 2:32 pm)
        Whoa! - PH-MT (Views: 576, 2020-01-06, 2:39 pm)
        Go run and tattle. Others gave their facts about the company - too, so carry on with your work. nm (Views: 476, 2020-01-06, 2:44 pm)
        There it is. That's the person I was thinking of. After - a negative remark was made (Views: 681, 2020-01-06, 7:54 pm)
        Pennhealth Mgr - PennHealth Mgt (Views: 742, 2020-01-06, 8:27 pm)
        What a joke. - MT2
        PennHealth - Mgt (Views: 663, 2020-01-07, 2:03 am)
        And how sad... - MT2 (Views: 558, 2020-01-07, 6:48 am)
        and she plays the mysterious game "if you knew the truth..." but - doesnt tell the truth, only shovels more BS sm (Views: 686, 2020-01-07, 8:43 am)
        I don't have to deflect - sm - Mgt (Views: 504, 2020-01-07, 9:15 am)
        I'm not the one you're addressing, but the rate of pay says it all, and the penalies - on the pay, sm (Views: 600, 2020-01-07, 11:49 am)
        oops, forgot the T - LOL, nm (Views: 471, 2020-01-07, 11:51 am)
        There is a complete lie right here - SM (Views: 541, 2020-01-07, 10:33 am)
        SM - Mgt (Views: 525, 2020-01-07, 11:03 am)
        Personally, I can see now exactly how PennHealth is with you - representing them, arguing and trying to SM (Views: 668, 2020-01-07, 11:24 am)
        I know right, 2 cents a line for reports sent to QA. How is that not a penalty? - needs to be the first thing, sm (Views: 625, 2020-01-07, 11:32 am)
        SMH - Mgt (Views: 626, 2020-01-07, 11:33 am)
        If you're talking to me, I have never worked for PennHealth and never would - at 2 cents a line, nm (Views: 546, 2020-01-07, 11:38 am)
        furthermore IC at 2 cents or even 3 cents a line is BS. I couldn't - make a mortgage payment, sm (Views: 462, 2020-01-07, 11:41 am)
        A real IC would be able to give you their line rate, send you their - invoices when due, and sm (Views: 634, 2020-01-07, 12:00 pm)
        It takes a village to transcribe some of these reports, 2 cents for sending - to QA, sm (Views: 752, 2020-01-07, 11:10 am)
        Get ready. - sm (Views: 447, 2020-01-07, 12:51 pm)
      - The money they - take for errors (sm) (Views: 623, 2020-01-06, 12:31 pm)
        They are owned by Indians. SM - SM (Views: 505, 2020-01-07, 10:19 am)
- At 2 cents a line for sending reports to QA, I think you have the answer how - they are to work for, nm (Views: 371, 2020-01-07, 11:15 am)
- Personally, I would not work for a company like this. We all need help - with these reports sometimes, sm (Views: 514, 2020-01-07, 11:36 am)
- If you are looking. - see message (Views: 495, 2020-01-07, 8:14 pm)