I have BOS 3. 4 cm x 4 cm is written 4 x 4 cm because sm - nm

Posted: Feb 23rd, 2019 - 10:40 am In Reply to: I think this has changed. Anyone have an actual - copy of BOS 3?

both are cm measurements. You are correct when one measurement is in mm and the other in cm to type both. I answered her particular question where both were cm.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

4 x 4 cm versus 4 cm x 4 cm - Sun (Views: 460, 2019-02-22, 2:07 pm)
- Account specs usually override any industry standards - nm (Views: 179, 2019-02-22, 2:43 pm)
- You're correct. 4 x 4 cm unless it's a verbatim account. nm - nm (Views: 234, 2019-02-22, 3:36 pm)
- I think this has changed. Anyone have an actual - copy of BOS 3? (Views: 188, 2019-02-22, 7:34 pm)
  - I have BOS 3. 4 cm x 4 cm is written 4 x 4 cm because sm - nm
    - I get all that and didn't need this clarification - I am saying it has changed (Views: 306, 2019-02-23, 9:50 pm)
    - 4 x 4 cm versus 4 cm x 4 cm - Sun (Views: 217, 2019-02-24, 4:41 am)
      - Looking up things in BOS 3 is a challenge! There are examples sm - nm (Views: 185, 2019-02-24, 10:59 am)
- MM/AQuity QA dinged me for doing just that. - Said 4 cm x 4 cm is just fine (Views: 232, 2019-02-23, 9:40 pm)
- Once again a trend that passed with no formal - announcement (Views: 155, 2019-02-24, 7:57 am)