4 x 4 cm versus 4 cm x 4 cm - Sun

I thought there was something in the AAMT BOS that says to eliminate the first cm/mm/m if dictated in this case if it is duplicate?  I was recently corrected by this by QA.  Am I wrong?   Thanks,

i.e. dictated 4 cm x 4 cm, but I typed it 4 x 4 cm.   

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

• 4 x 4 cm versus 4 cm x 4 cm - Sun (Views: 459, 2019-02-22, 2:07 pm)
  • Account specs usually override any industry standards - nm (Views: 177, 2019-02-22, 2:43 pm)
  • You're correct. 4 x 4 cm unless it's a verbatim account. nm - nm (Views: 228, 2019-02-22, 3:36 pm)
  • I think this has changed. Anyone have an actual - copy of BOS 3? (Views: 187, 2019-02-22, 7:34 pm)
    • I have BOS 3. 4 cm x 4 cm is written 4 x 4 cm because sm - nm (Views: 199, 2019-02-23, 10:40 am)
      • I get all that and didn't need this clarification - I am saying it has changed (Views: 305, 2019-02-23, 9:50 pm)
      • 4 x 4 cm versus 4 cm x 4 cm - Sun (Views: 217, 2019-02-24, 4:41 am)
        • Looking up things in BOS 3 is a challenge! There are examples sm - nm (Views: 185, 2019-02-24, 10:59 am)
  • MM/AQuity QA dinged me for doing just that. - Said 4 cm x 4 cm is just fine (Views: 232, 2019-02-23, 9:40 pm)
  • Once again a trend that passed with no formal - announcement (Views: 155, 2019-02-24, 7:57 am)

• Latest Posts
• Unanswered
• Top Viewed
• Most Discussed
• Most Liked