PFFT - MT23

Posted: Feb 20th, 2018 - 4:38 pm In Reply to: An MT sent an email as a group message to - All imedx

At least she didn't get an e mail IN ALL CAPS from the supervisor stating to stop asking questions and sending to every one. My company is at that point. We aren't allowed to communicate or question at least not to each other.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Imedx email clap backs - Anon (Views: 1693, 2018-02-20, 9:23 am)
- Not sure what your post is about. sm - Doubter (Views: 978, 2018-02-20, 9:48 am)
  - and here we go again with the "ladies" - nm (Views: 768, 2018-02-20, 10:11 am)
    - Share Details! - Please (Views: 734, 2018-02-20, 10:21 am)
      - sorry, I just mean referring to everyone here as - ladies sm (Views: 776, 2018-02-20, 10:40 am)
        It was literally only women writing the emails dude - Chill out (Views: 698, 2018-02-20, 10:51 am)
        "ladies" is still an old term - it is 2018 NM (Views: 700, 2018-02-20, 10:53 am)
        Dont mansplain to me. - I dont need your toxic masculinity (Views: 663, 2018-02-20, 10:57 am)
        HAHAHAHAHA, "toxic masculinity". GTFOI - nm (Views: 672, 2018-02-20, 10:58 am)
        Ladies is a respectful term, of which you - obviously do not know (Views: 708, 2018-02-20, 11:58 am)
      - The courageous ladies were voicing their concerns - Anon (Views: 747, 2018-02-20, 10:53 am)
        Ladies - HAHA (Views: 681, 2018-02-20, 11:10 am)
        Girl power. Hell hath no fury - Like a WOMAN scored (Views: 641, 2018-02-20, 11:17 am)
    - uh oh, I referred to the service people - as gals---seemed better than (Views: 533, 2018-02-23, 4:22 pm)
- we have no idea what you are referring to - please elaborate (Views: 794, 2018-02-20, 10:54 am)
  - An MT sent an email as a group message to - All imedx (Views: 868, 2018-02-20, 12:12 pm)
    - This is how my OM constantly spoke to me - Anon (Views: 756, 2018-02-20, 12:18 pm)
    - Their next step will likely be to disallow... - sm (Views: 771, 2018-02-20, 12:59 pm)
      - I thought of that, too, but does it really - matter at this point? (Views: 673, 2018-02-20, 1:15 pm)
    - IMedX emails - Anon (Views: 1012, 2018-02-20, 3:19 pm)
    - PFFT - MT23
- I'm loving it! I think people have finally had enough. - nm (Views: 821, 2018-02-20, 11:36 am)
  - Me too!!! - KISS MY GRITS IMEDX (Views: 746, 2018-02-20, 11:48 am)
- Congratulations to everyone for following - through with the plan. (Views: 773, 2018-02-20, 12:26 pm)
- Uh-oh. Did someone just get a bit tense at the suggestion to cc - imedx CEO (Views: 874, 2018-02-20, 1:31 pm)
  - KC is flipping her wig! - Haha (Views: 733, 2018-02-20, 1:34 pm)
    - What is happening now? nm - Anymore replies from them? (Views: 845, 2018-02-20, 2:18 pm)
      - HR has not addressed any of the questions - as usual (Views: 705, 2018-02-20, 2:22 pm)
        Someone please ask them about their promise of transparency - Anon (Views: 614, 2018-02-20, 2:28 pm)
        HAHAHA!!! - good one nm (Views: 570, 2018-02-20, 2:46 pm)
        Carbon copy the CEO anyway. Why not? - What is left to lose? (Views: 577, 2018-02-20, 2:53 pm)
- imedx responds with - body slam (Views: 698, 2018-02-25, 8:54 am)