Uh-oh. Did someone just get a bit tense at the suggestion to cc - imedx CEO

Posted: Feb 20th, 2018 - 1:31 pm In Reply to: Imedx email clap backs - Anon

Now that I look closer, I see she emailed to Foley and Sharma. I guess HE is reading these emails but choosing not to reply. Maybe they have to consult with their attorneys before they can answer any questions.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Imedx email clap backs - Anon (Views: 1693, 2018-02-20, 9:23 am)
- Not sure what your post is about. sm - Doubter (Views: 978, 2018-02-20, 9:48 am)
  - and here we go again with the "ladies" - nm (Views: 768, 2018-02-20, 10:11 am)
    - Share Details! - Please (Views: 734, 2018-02-20, 10:21 am)
      - sorry, I just mean referring to everyone here as - ladies sm (Views: 776, 2018-02-20, 10:40 am)
        It was literally only women writing the emails dude - Chill out (Views: 698, 2018-02-20, 10:51 am)
        "ladies" is still an old term - it is 2018 NM (Views: 700, 2018-02-20, 10:53 am)
        Dont mansplain to me. - I dont need your toxic masculinity (Views: 663, 2018-02-20, 10:57 am)
        HAHAHAHAHA, "toxic masculinity". GTFOI - nm (Views: 672, 2018-02-20, 10:58 am)
        Ladies is a respectful term, of which you - obviously do not know (Views: 708, 2018-02-20, 11:58 am)
      - The courageous ladies were voicing their concerns - Anon (Views: 747, 2018-02-20, 10:53 am)
        Ladies - HAHA (Views: 681, 2018-02-20, 11:10 am)
        Girl power. Hell hath no fury - Like a WOMAN scored (Views: 641, 2018-02-20, 11:17 am)
    - uh oh, I referred to the service people - as gals---seemed better than (Views: 533, 2018-02-23, 4:22 pm)
- we have no idea what you are referring to - please elaborate (Views: 794, 2018-02-20, 10:54 am)
  - An MT sent an email as a group message to - All imedx (Views: 868, 2018-02-20, 12:12 pm)
    - This is how my OM constantly spoke to me - Anon (Views: 756, 2018-02-20, 12:18 pm)
    - Their next step will likely be to disallow... - sm (Views: 771, 2018-02-20, 12:59 pm)
      - I thought of that, too, but does it really - matter at this point? (Views: 673, 2018-02-20, 1:15 pm)
    - IMedX emails - Anon (Views: 1012, 2018-02-20, 3:19 pm)
    - PFFT - MT23 (Views: 682, 2018-02-20, 4:38 pm)
- I'm loving it! I think people have finally had enough. - nm (Views: 821, 2018-02-20, 11:36 am)
  - Me too!!! - KISS MY GRITS IMEDX (Views: 746, 2018-02-20, 11:48 am)
- Congratulations to everyone for following - through with the plan. (Views: 773, 2018-02-20, 12:26 pm)
- Uh-oh. Did someone just get a bit tense at the suggestion to cc - imedx CEO
  - KC is flipping her wig! - Haha (Views: 733, 2018-02-20, 1:34 pm)
    - What is happening now? nm - Anymore replies from them? (Views: 845, 2018-02-20, 2:18 pm)
      - HR has not addressed any of the questions - as usual (Views: 705, 2018-02-20, 2:22 pm)
        Someone please ask them about their promise of transparency - Anon (Views: 614, 2018-02-20, 2:28 pm)
        HAHAHA!!! - good one nm (Views: 570, 2018-02-20, 2:46 pm)
        Carbon copy the CEO anyway. Why not? - What is left to lose? (Views: 577, 2018-02-20, 2:53 pm)
- imedx responds with - body slam (Views: 698, 2018-02-25, 8:54 am)