A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
I'm am interested in getting into Medical Transcriptionist or a Coder. Can anyone please help me with information regarding a acceptable school or program. Thank you for your help.
We said the same things as you 5-10 years ago (not expecting the full impact of VR in addition), that offshoring couldn't become that popular, there would be too many facilities who would still want their records only onshore.
We're not Chicken Littles; we're experienced with the scenario and want to warn others so they don't suffer our fate in another decade when their job opportunities are drying up and their pay is decreasing, etc. Maybe it doesn't matter much to you now where you are in your lifespan, hopefully you'll do fine until retirement, but if a friend asked me my opinion about medical coding as a career, from my perspective as an MT, I'd do my best to steer them away from it and tell them that they would do better to spend their time and money training for something else with more definite long-term viability.
"The mature global technology infrastructure and seamless integrated solutions places Indian companies in a good position to process outsourced healthcare work. An example is the ICD 10 conversion change due by October 2013. It is expected to impact the medical coding industry and is likely to spur a great demand for offshore outsourcing. It is projected that a large percentage of medical coding in the future will be processed in India."
http://philcsolomon.com/2012/10/09/healthcare-offshore-outsourcing
I offered up evidence about the potential for coding to go more offshore in the future, as well as how many positions are open in India for the same now. To what degree or how long the process will take is anybody's guess. My personal experience is what has happened to my career over the past 20 years. I know what the early warning signs are from personal experience, whereas you don't.
You insult my intelligence by saying I don't know what Informatics is and how one could get into coding first and then transition into it. Why do you think I said "... starting right off the bat"? (i.e., as opposed to transitioning into it later) You also don't even have the foggiest what I've learned or attempted to do career-wise besides MT (it wasn't in the medical field at all, I can tell you that). How presumptuous. Talk about speculation.
Once again, I would not advise a friend or confidante of mine to go into coding. If anything I've said makes those considering this career research it more fully first (including Informatics, which the non-coding aspect of can't be offshored), then more power to them.
If the field is even just somewhat full of the same kind of self-important, reality-denying, superiority-complex-driven folks as can be found on this board, then I thank my lucky stars that I never pursued it as a career, yeehaw. I've worked with some B's on-site in my day, but I think some of you all would take the cake.
"As an experienced MT/coding school graduate working in clinical documentation, I would like to share my thoughts."
First, coding does not have to be offshored or outsourced for it to change dratstically [sic] and require fewer jobs, There is also a thing called computer assisted coding and I have seen first hand what that does."
Most of us know what computer-assisted coding is, but you seem to be claiming here that you have some sort of insider information. I've seen CAC also and I don't share your opinion to the point where it will change my career path or advise others to avoid coding.
Is it possible that your experience as a (displaced?) MT is coloring your views on this?
"Fewer coders are needed to actually code. Instead, they correct mistakes and review records."
From what source are you getting this information? If you are claiming to have this special, insider information which conflicts with industry projections, please cite your source.
"I know, many of you at a lofty level of professional coding would never be involved in anything as menial as that, but to say that coding is an occupation that will continue to grow is misleading."
The way this is written makes your points difficult to understand. Where is anyone claiming unlimited growth for coders?
I thought you were a coding graduate. Does your statement mean that you are not a "professional coder"? Does it mean that you did a quick course on coding and didn't get any kind of certification? This is how I started as a coder, by the way.
As far as job growth, coding is a skill in a growing field. I'm getting the information that the field of Health Information Management/Health Informatics is growing from AHIMA and various other credible sources. If you have conflicting information, please cite a credible source.
Also, what's with the sarcasm?
"In regard to MTs not being important to the health care team,"
No one has said that. Do you realize that most people on this site are MTs?
"...that is just wrong. I have seen a number of critical errors in edited reports that would affect patient care, and Medicare did withhold payment on some claims because of errors. Codes are assigned from those reports, and that is where it all begins in the billing process; the operative report and discharge summary are important documents in the process, and everyone; physicians, nurses, MTs, coders and other ancillary personnel need to work together as a team."
You caught some errors and we all need to work as a team? You have lost me with this paragraph. Are you trying to say that it is important that the documentation in the medical record supports the coding? If so, you are right.
"I am very tired of the "I am better than you because I am a coder and you are a worthless MT" mentality that I encounter on this board"
I'm still confused about your point(s), plus all of the sudden your words are angry again. MTs are an important part of the medical team. It's not my fault that the industry is dying. Don't project your anger about that on me or anyone else here, ok? I'm tired of the victim complex. MTs got a raw deal. We all know that. I don't think I'm better than anyone else. In fact, I am making an effort to try to reach out and to understand where you are coming from.
"...and hopefully you are not representative of your entire profession."
As I hope that you are not representative of everyone working with medical records? Yikes.
"Coding is challenging and it is worth pursuing, but it is not for everyone."
I agree with that. Some people can't stand coding because they find it so boring. It's not for everyone.
"It has always been difficult to break
into coding."
I actually think it is a little easier now to get started in coding. It feels easier to me, anyway, 20 years later. We didn't have the internet around when I started coding. I feel really old having just made that statement!
"That has not changed and it is probably going to get worse,"
That is your opinion. Why?
"good luck to the new grads in a tough job market."
Uh, thanks? Is this more sarcasm? Sheesh.
"There is always more than one side to any story."
This is not a story, though. I'd like to think that we are having a discussion about medical coding and how that skill fits into the future of HIM.
"The MTs who choose to come to the coding forum to express their views (or fears and concerns) need to feel welcome and not be told that they are somehow deficient because they couldn't land that first coding job or because their finances prevent them from pursuing an education."
These victim statements sound familiar. Every few months someone comes on here and posts, gets into a big snit, and then leaves in a huff. It's one person. If this is you, why are you back? Everyone is welcome here, right? They are to me, anyway. I am so sorry if you are poor (me too) or if you couldn't find the job you wanted right off the bat. Sounds like you are doing great, though, if you are working in clinical documentation.
"There are bumps in the road and unpleasant things that happen in all occupations; it is never a straight line from point A to point B."
Your entire post is filled with these fortune cookie bits of general wisdom, but I'd rather know what your points are. I'm not trying to be a jerk; I can see that you want to be perceived as an intelligent person, but your post is not as persuasive as it could be if you would stick to your points.
"Coders are not "disaster proof," and those of you who think you are may be headed for a fall, [sic]"
I don't understand your point in this sentence, other than we are all headed to ruin because we aren't listening to you.
If no one is listening, perhaps it may be because you are hard to understand? Could you please restate some of your post?
Here are some links about issues you have brought up:
http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_036238.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_036238
http://www.m-scribe.com/blog/bid/200134/Computer-Assisted-Coding-CAC-A-Coder-Prospective
http://blogs.hcpro.com/acdis/2012/05/determining-the-benefit-of-flesh-and-blood-cdi-vs-computer-assisted-coding/
Conference from last year: http://www.ahima.org/Events/EventCalendar/Event.aspx?Id=b7798f17-7eeb-4a74-8a10-672ef5c3483b
http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/article/computer-assisted-coding-ready-inpatient-use
http://www.findacode.com/articles/computer-assisted-coding-vs-find-a-code.html
Court reporting blog
Linda Bland's Blog.