do your research - big fight in the past than ended well. - anon
[ In Reply To ..]
does not matter - he created the site and owns it - and that's all.
well know for years and years and years. I support this board. there are others if this bothers you.
p.s. I am an American MT.
I think most of that whole blow-up has been erased on the web. - SM
[ In Reply To ..]
If I recall correctly, it was mirrored for a short while on another site, but that has since been taken down, as well. There are certain to be old threads about it in the sci.med.transcription newsgroup, however. This was something like 4-5 years ago or more, wasn't it?
you know, this sight may have sold again since that as well. - anon
[ In Reply To ..]
speak now, think later - that's me!
my bad.
good luck finding Usenet archives, though - sm - anonymous
[ In Reply To ..]
Google allegedly archives Usenet, including sci.med.transcription, but the archives have been disappearing steadily through archive rot. If there were old threads no one can see them anymore.
I'm sure a quick posting to s.m.t. would bring about an equally quick response, though. - same players there NM
[ In Reply To ..]
once to research who the administrators and the moderators of this forum are, cold not find anything. I think the name of the owner was never posted. I also heard that the owner changed.
at this point, I'd rather be chuckling to the bank instead of - just chuckling. NM
I am so sick of not getting the same set of accounts any 2 days in a row. Ah, yes, take away my most potent tool for an increased line count - familiarity with the doctors and CP.
Oh well, I can say I have work today.
Can't wait until I get outta here! ...
Just informed that, if you do not have the accelerate silent audio turned on under tools AND you disable it for every single report, there will be dictation audio skipped over. And, of course, there goes your audit score!
So sick of this. Most of the IT personnel should be fired for their exceptionally poor performance, especially as it affects patient care. ...
This time it is a MTD (month to date) graph. Complete with new threats!!
"The HDS has a target goal of 99.50 for an average QA score. The PCs and HDSM have account goals as part of their objectives. As noted above, our accounts are required to meet a quality index of 99.60, critical errors 2.75% or less, noncritical errors 14% or less, and minor errors 24% or less. When we review this data many of the goals are not being met. When your individual scor ...
Whatever my count is, too bad. With the sorry excuse for ASR that we given to edit, let the chips lay where they might. Whatever my line count is, I am doing the best I can - as confirmed by the fact I have next to no nonproductive time showing on my statistics. ...