It was never their intention to pay which is why - they refuse to say which platform

Posted: Aug 11th, 2017 - 6:26 pm In Reply to: Why do they insist on using the word "eligible" - when they have never outlined specifically

They never had any intention of paying except for those "token" payments of what? $22.00? $30.00?

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

New message on Webclock - dl (Views: 1245, 2017-08-11, 8:32 am)
- I wonder if it will be accurate? We'll see. - ym574 (Views: 674, 2017-08-11, 8:36 am)
  - All incentive or only ones that "qualified" - NanaMT (Views: 674, 2017-08-11, 8:57 am)
- Why can't we see the amount on ADP like we do for pay weeks? nm - mtmtmt (Views: 645, 2017-08-11, 8:58 am)
  - New message - Irritated MT (Views: 825, 2017-08-11, 9:02 am)
    - But we will never know if anyone really got paid - under this new message, will we? (Views: 605, 2017-08-11, 9:21 am)
- Have they ever actually came out and said - specifically what platforms included? (Views: 734, 2017-08-11, 9:01 am)
  - Platforms..... - NanaMT (Views: 658, 2017-08-11, 9:04 am)
    - Same here. Work on Apex and Escription. - Same generic message, but (Views: 767, 2017-08-11, 9:05 am)
      - Platform - NanaMT (Views: 578, 2017-08-11, 10:25 am)
        Platform - NA (Views: 648, 2017-08-11, 10:58 am)
- Of course, that could just be a message to make people - think they paid and some are (Views: 614, 2017-08-11, 9:07 am)
  - so true.... - NanaMT (Views: 565, 2017-08-11, 9:12 am)
    - I was just thinking that. They will claim the AHR - message was never posted. (Views: 573, 2017-08-11, 9:14 am)
      - AHR message - anon (Views: 600, 2017-08-11, 9:27 am)
        As I am sure everyone did, just like the Enrich - messages. Hope for the best I guess. (Views: 555, 2017-08-11, 9:42 am)
  - LOL and next message will be back to production pay - and rendering the prior 2 messages (Views: 580, 2017-08-11, 9:19 am)
- Funny, this message on the face of it would make it - appear they just had not finished (Views: 641, 2017-08-11, 10:00 am)
  - Automated vs. manual for thousands - sm (Views: 575, 2017-08-11, 11:00 am)
- Why do they insist on using the word "eligible" - when they have never outlined specifically (Views: 625, 2017-08-11, 11:09 am)
  - It was never their intention to pay which is why - they refuse to say which platform
    - The truth - truthseeker (Views: 599, 2017-08-11, 7:01 pm)
- tangled web we weave - sneakypete (Views: 546, 2017-08-11, 12:29 pm)
- Today received email confirming 1.5 AHR not - for my platform - nm (Views: 690, 2017-08-11, 5:11 pm)
  - Platform - NanaMT (Views: 522, 2017-08-12, 9:09 am)