Who is intimidated, or even intimidating - Just what it is

Posted: Jan 28th, 2016 - 1:13 pm In Reply to: This is outright - Intimidation

I do not give a rat's behind if others sue and it comes down to their being found out, nothing to me. Here is a person who apparently is fine with the job listening to a person saying to file action against the company for perhaps the worker to suffer in the end. This makes sense to anyone?

Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Has anyone actually filed an SS-8 against TTS? - and won and kept job sm (Views: 980, 2016-01-27, 11:23 am)
- I think you probably know the answer to that - without asking (Views: 840, 2016-01-27, 3:59 pm)
  - This is outright - Intimidation (Views: 893, 2016-01-28, 12:57 pm)
    - Who is intimidated, or even intimidating - Just what it is
      - OP - we "suffer" in the end either way because - sm (Views: 645, 2016-01-28, 1:35 pm)
        As I do not pay taxes, no concern - for me (Views: 600, 2016-01-28, 1:44 pm)
        You don't have to pay taxes if you don't - exeed the amount allotted (Views: 605, 2016-01-28, 1:48 pm)
        Not retired and the income is high - still pay no taxes (Views: 857, 2016-01-28, 2:03 pm)
- Retaliation would bring them way more trouble - than the SS-8. Good luck! (Views: 714, 2016-01-27, 5:43 pm)
- What is TTS' version of IC? - nm (Views: 830, 2016-01-28, 5:20 am)
  - Their version is the schedule, as is any company who - sm (Views: 670, 2016-01-28, 8:37 am)
- File SS-8 - If your tax person (Views: 1329, 2016-01-28, 8:16 am)
  - Just one simple question. Is TTS the only - place that (Views: 737, 2016-01-28, 9:16 am)
    - You sound . . . - Like . . . (Views: 644, 2016-01-28, 9:47 am)
      - And your comment is the most common - when you have issues (Views: 711, 2016-01-28, 10:15 am)
    - Then - STOP (Views: 752, 2016-01-28, 10:41 am)
    - No TTS is not the only one, but in this case - this was the company being (Views: 647, 2016-01-28, 11:36 am)
      - Seeing FutureNet has identical issue - Heading this section (Views: 714, 2016-01-28, 11:56 am)
        Notice how - Somebody (Views: 564, 2016-01-28, 12:20 pm)
        Yes. Ha ha. (nm) - ExTTS (Views: 677, 2016-01-28, 12:29 pm)
        I have no knowledge of FutureNet, only what, if you read this section, - tops the comments (Views: 579, 2016-01-28, 1:02 pm)
- Wow-I just looked at the SS-8 form and - just sayin (Views: 754, 2016-01-29, 10:15 am)
  - Download SS-8 here - Nancy (Views: 563, 2016-01-29, 10:40 am)
- Retaliating against whistle-blowers is illegal, too. - nm (Views: 558, 2016-01-29, 1:26 pm)

Who is intimidated, or even intimidating - Just what it is

Post A Reply

Reply By Email