So...how many 'critical' errors have y'all found in this Best Practices document so far? I am pretty confident the author/editor had far more time to proof than we do and was not being paid 'per line' nor harassed for inactive time nor (apparently!) audited. I have only skimmed it but found inserted words, words copied from one section to another where they didn't fit, discrepancies between different parts...
marks the location of current message within thread)
