I understand that - my point was that we worked - by TT rules from beginning until

Posted: Aug 7th, 2015 - 12:27 pm In Reply to: That was then with TransTech - this is now with Imedx

one by one Imedx started changing them, and I am certain I have THAT original email stating we would continue with TT guidelines for accounts. Just saying. Imedx NEVER disputed anything about TT rules outright, just changed them one by one.

Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Does anyone have an email that says 187.5 lph is the minimum? - (sm) (Views: 1042, 2015-08-07, 12:00 pm)
- not sure about email but I have - original hanbook on paper (Views: 473, 2015-08-07, 12:22 pm)
- That was then with TransTech - this is now with Imedx (Views: 478, 2015-08-07, 12:23 pm)
  - I understand that - my point was that we worked - by TT rules from beginning until
- 187.5 LPH - anonMT (Views: 610, 2015-08-07, 12:25 pm)
  - Thanks anonMT - for this ^^^^ (Views: 527, 2015-08-07, 12:51 pm)
  - Oh, I forgot about that one. To poster who emailed me: - This should help. (Views: 553, 2015-08-07, 1:00 pm)

I understand that - my point was that we worked - by TT rules from beginning until

Post A Reply

Reply By Email