Agree, EMDAT is cumbersome to use. The only - thing I like about it is

Posted: Apr 19th, 2018 - 2:17 pm In Reply to: Emdat horrible, Escription better but Fluency is best sm - ohmemy

the method for looking up prior dictations - much easier than on eScription. They all kinda suck. I want my BayScribe back! Ages ago when I was with MedQuist I used DocQscribe. The old typing platforms were the best.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Is Edmat or Escription a good system to learn. I have always worked on - PAMT (Views: 1016, 2018-04-19, 6:25 am)
- I work on both. There are things about each that - I like/dislike. Not difficult (Views: 568, 2018-04-19, 6:38 am)
- Emdat horrible, Escription better but Fluency is best sm - ohmemy (Views: 685, 2018-04-19, 10:03 am)
  - Agree, EMDAT is cumbersome to use. The only - thing I like about it is
  - Keizer - Happy MLS (Views: 526, 2018-04-25, 6:04 am)
    - So how's the QA? - just checkin (Views: 249, 2018-05-17, 6:45 pm)
- Are we talking about the Emdat version - that has the text boxes (Views: 517, 2018-04-20, 7:19 pm)
  - Right, structured InScribe vs. unstructured, yuck. - and paying less for "qualified text"-nm (Views: 605, 2018-04-20, 8:15 pm)
    - What?? - smr (Views: 195, 2018-05-17, 6:46 pm)