...then there wont BE any "customers." - hawtmk

Posted: Feb 3rd, 2017 - 2:25 pm In Reply to: On the other hand - xx

because who are the "customers"?? Why, EMPLOYEES (who have a job and therefore money) of course.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

WSJ Article: The End of Employees - Even mentions MTs. (Views: 1839, 2017-02-02, 3:27 pm)
- On the other hand - xx (Views: 741, 2017-02-02, 6:53 pm)
  - Actually, there have already been examples of robots misbehaving. - But worry not - (Views: 669, 2017-02-02, 7:35 pm)
    - No need to worry about me - at all (Views: 761, 2017-02-02, 8:45 pm)
  - But... if employees are all replaced by 'bots, - who will have money for fast food? (Views: 690, 2017-02-03, 1:21 am)
    - This is why... - see msg (Views: 737, 2017-02-03, 8:33 am)
  - ...then there wont BE any "customers." - hawtmk
    - You do realize - xx (Views: 640, 2017-02-03, 4:07 pm)
- It's not just fast food using...SM - Old Anon (Views: 572, 2017-02-03, 10:04 am)
- I've seen an increase in part-time and IC jobs in various industries since.... - My 2 cents (Views: 679, 2017-02-03, 12:03 pm)
- Upping the minimum wage is not helping workers only - eliminating them (Views: 619, 2017-02-04, 8:50 am)
  - People Do Not Get that - see msg (Views: 572, 2017-02-04, 12:57 pm)
  - What to do? sm - Anon (Views: 598, 2017-02-04, 2:37 pm)
    - Hear, hear! - xx (Views: 517, 2017-02-04, 4:08 pm)
    - Apparently, Suggesting Alternatives - Makes us Mean (Views: 686, 2017-02-05, 12:20 pm)