Less $ for canned text is BS and here's why... - Cranky

Posted: Dec 1st, 2016 - 6:17 pm In Reply to: Take nothing but FULL PAY for...SM - Old Anon

I have yet to insert canned text or "normal template" without the dictator asking me to go in and change this and revise that. It is so gross that our skill set and expertise are not even mildly fairly compensated. :(

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Got an offer to test for Integrity HD. Pay was 7 and - wannie (Views: 3134, 2016-11-30, 2:43 pm)
- IHD - looking (Views: 2015, 2016-11-30, 7:00 pm)
  - Take nothing but FULL PAY for...SM - Old Anon (Views: 2212, 2016-12-01, 4:52 am)
    - Less $ for canned text is BS and here's why... - Cranky
      - We get paid for any revisions at regular pay. - MT (Views: 1686, 2016-12-01, 11:49 pm)
- I work for Integrity HD and love it - MT (Views: 5257, 2016-12-01, 1:01 pm)
  - Even the 7 CPL for straight transcription is - wannie (Views: 2426, 2016-12-01, 1:51 pm)
    - I understand. - MT (Views: 1655, 2016-12-01, 2:28 pm)
  - Love Integrity! - Tired hands (Views: 1878, 2017-04-03, 1:55 pm)
- Question: The "norm" now is unpaid headings... - at most of the (Views: 1519, 2016-12-01, 11:34 pm)
  - Not talking about headings. "canned text can be" sm - no name (Views: 1451, 2016-12-02, 2:11 am)
- Integrity HD - MTinTexas (Views: 2497, 2016-12-05, 10:28 am)
  - I don't think I even hinted about there being a question of getting - wannie (Views: 1963, 2016-12-05, 10:36 am)